# Novel Allocation Strategies Can Boost Kidney Exchange Programs: A Monte Carlo Simulation

**Authors:** Mattheüs F. Klaassen, Marry de Klerk, Marije C. Baas, Hanneke Bouwsma, Laura B. Bungener, Maarten H. L. Christiaans, Twan Dollevoet, Kristiaan Glorie, Sebastiaan Heidt, Aline C. Hemke, Margriet F. C. de Jong, Judith A. Kal-van Gestel, Marcia M. L. Kho, Jeroen D. Langereis, Karlijn A. M. I. van der Pant, Claudia M. Ranzijn, Dave L. Roelen, Eric Spierings, Christina E. M. Voorter, Jacqueline van de Wetering, Arjan D. van Zuilen, Joke I. Roodnat, Annelies E. de Weerd

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/ti.2026.15423 · Transplant International · 2026-03-04

## TL;DR

New allocation strategies in kidney exchange programs can significantly increase transplant rates for difficult-to-match patients.

## Contribution

A novel allocation algorithm with ABO-incompatible and HLA-incompatible matching is shown to improve transplant rates in kidney exchange programs.

## Key findings

- The novel algorithm increased transplant rates for incompatible pairs from 44% to 53%.
- Including unspecified donors increased transplant rates for incompatible pairs up to 64%.
- Allowing compatible pairs to participate in KEP matched 58% of them with fewer HLA mismatches.

## Abstract

Kidney exchange programs (KEPs) enhance access to living donor kidney transplantation. Nonetheless, transplant rates in KEP remain low for highly immunized and blood type O patients. In the Netherlands, a novel allocation algorithm is being implemented, allowing ABO-incompatible matching for long waiting patients, next to prioritization and ‘low-level’ HLA-incompatible matching for selected highly immunized patients. We simulated this novel algorithm along with additional scenarios, by using a retrospective, 6-year cohort of Dutch KEP. For each scenario, 30 simulations were repeated with Monte Carlo technique. The novel algorithm increased median KEP transplant rate for incompatible pairs (53% versus 44%, p < 0.001) and for difficult-to-match subgroups. HLA-incompatible matching increased transplant rate for selected highly immunized patients significantly, while participation with multiple donors per recipient did not. In additional simulations, including all non-KEP unspecified donors (n = 150) for local KEP participation increased transplant rate for incompatible pairs up to 64% (p < 0.001). Simulating additional KEP participation by compatible pairs (n = 149), on the condition a KEP match should have fewer HLA mismatches, resulted in 58% being matched in KEP. In conclusion, differential matching algorithms can boost KEP transplant rates, allowing incompatible matching for difficult-to-match subgroups, facilitating participation of unspecified donors, and optimizing the HLA matching of compatible pairs.

Infographic of a Monte Carlo simulation to novel algorithms for kidney exchange programs. It presents analyses of different scenarios like priority for difficult-to-match patients, incompatible matching, unspecified donor participation and kidney exchange participation by compatible pairs. The simulation was performed with data from the Dutch KEP (2018-2023). Key findings highlight improved transplantation rates for difficult-to-match and long waiting patients. One scenario with extra compatible pair participation showed that 58% of compatible pairs could find a better match via KEP, while simultaneously enabling 57 more transplants for incompatible pairs with statistical significance (p<0.001). Logos for ESOT and Transplant International are included.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** kidney disease (MONDO:0001343)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** HLA-A (major histocompatibility complex, class I, A) [NCBI Gene 3105] {aka HLAA}
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12995821/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12995821/full.md

## References

62 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12995821/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12995821