# Predictive value of OGTT parameters and clinical markers in gestational diabetes mellitus: a prospective randomized controlled trial from a tertiary center in Türkiye

**Authors:** Batuhan Turgay, Uğurcan Zorlu, Harun Kılıçkıran, Kayra Turgay, Gülşah Aynaoğlu Yıldız, Elif Gül Yapar Eyi, A. Seval Ozgu-Erdinc

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2026.1793806 · Frontiers in Endocrinology · 2026-03-04

## TL;DR

This study compares two methods for diagnosing gestational diabetes and finds that a one-step glucose test identifies more cases but doesn't improve outcomes, with 2-hour glucose levels being most predictive of complications.

## Contribution

Demonstrates that 2-hour OGTT values are better predictors of pregnancy complications than diagnostic thresholds alone.

## Key findings

- One-step OGTT identifies more GDM cases but doesn't improve maternal or neonatal outcomes compared to two-step strategy.
- 2-hour OGTT glucose levels show strongest predictive value for polyhydramnios and insulin requirement (AUC up to 0.816 and 0.808).
- Rates of complications like macrosomia and preterm birth are similar between diagnostic approaches.

## Abstract

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) remains a major obstetric concern, yet the optimal screening strategy and the prognostic value of oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) parameters remain debated. We aimed to compare the diagnostic yield and clinical outcomes of a two-step OGTT strategy (50 g glucose challenge followed by 100 g OGTT) versus a one-step 75 g OGTT approach, and to evaluate the predictive performance of individual OGTT time points for pregnancy complications and treatment requirement.

In this prospective randomized controlled trial, 1,439 pregnant women undergoing routine screening at 24–28 weeks of gestation were randomized to either a two-step OGTT strategy (n=719) or a one-step 75 g OGTT strategy (n=720). GDM was classified as diet-controlled or insulin-requiring. Maternal risk factors, obstetric outcomes, and neonatal outcomes were recorded. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses assessed the predictive ability of OGTT parameters for polyhydramnios and insulin requirement.

Overall GDM prevalence was 12.3%, including 8.4% diet-controlled and 3.9% insulin-requiring cases. The one-step strategy identified a numerically higher proportion of GDM without significant differences in maternal or neonatal outcomes compared with the two-step approach. Rates of polyhydramnios, hypertensive disorders, macrosomia, cesarean delivery, preterm birth, neonatal intensive care admission, small for gestational age (7.4%), and intrauterine growth restriction (4.2%) were comparable between groups. ROC analyses demonstrated that 2-hour OGTT values showed the strongest predictive performance for polyhydramnios (AUC up to 0.816) and insulin requirement (AUC up to 0.808), whereas the 50 g screening test showed only moderate discrimination.

The one-step 75 g OGTT increases diagnostic labeling without improving short-term clinical outcomes. Post-load OGTT values—particularly 2-hour glucose levels—provide the most clinically meaningful prognostic information and may support a risk-stratified approach to GDM management rather than expansion of diagnostic thresholds alone.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** gestational diabetes mellitus (MONDO:0005406), polyhydramnios (MONDO:0004585), intrauterine growth restriction (MONDO:0005030)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** INS (insulin) [NCBI Gene 3630] {aka IDDM, IDDM1, IDDM2, ILPR, IRDN, MODY10}
- **Diseases:** pregnancy complications (MESH:D011248), polyhydramnios (MESH:D006831), macrosomia (MESH:D005320), GDM (MESH:D016640), hypertensive disorders (MESH:D006973), intrauterine growth restriction (MESH:D005317), preterm birth (MESH:D047928)
- **Chemicals:** glucose (MESH:D005947)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12995782/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12995782/full.md

## References

19 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12995782/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12995782