# Assessing factors that influence perceived burnout in postdoctoral fellows and identifying recommendations to support their well-being

**Authors:** Suzanne C. Harris, Emma Smits, Robert McGinity, Jacqueline M. Zeeman

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0344974 · PLOS One · 2026-03-17

## TL;DR

This study explores factors affecting burnout and well-being in postdoctoral fellows and offers recommendations to support them.

## Contribution

The study provides new insights into burnout factors and well-being strategies specific to postdoctoral fellows in health sciences.

## Key findings

- Insufficient resources, difficult transition, and workload contribute to burnout.
- Reasonable supervisor expectations and support improve well-being.
- Participants suggested institutional initiatives and workload strategies to reduce burnout.

## Abstract

While current evidence suggests rates of stress and burnout among healthcare professionals and graduate trainees are up to 50%, higher than the general population, there is a critical gap in the literature concerning factors which influence well-being among postdoctoral fellows in health sciences programs. This exploratory study aims to identify factors influencing well-being and burnout among these postdoctoral fellows and identify recommendations to improve their well-being.

A two-stage sampling approach was used: (1) Purposive sample of postdoctoral fellows employed at a public university were recruited to participate in semi-structured focus groups to assess workplace factors which influence their perceived burnout and well-being and to solicit recommendations to improve well-being; (2) Stratified sampling was used to assign participants into focus groups by industry-sponsored or academic (non-industry-sponsored) positions to explore experiences that may be unique to these groups. Inductive coding and thematic analysis of Zoom transcripts were used.

Seven postdoctoral fellows participated in three focus group sessions, with two industry-sponsored fellows in one group, three academic fellows in one group, and two academic fellows in one group. Participants identified insufficient resources, difficult transition, and workload and program structure as factors contributing to their perceived burnout. Factors contributing to their well-being included reasonable supervisor expectations, personal and professional support, and resource support. Participant recommendations to improve well-being included institutional initiatives and resources, additional non-supervisor support, and workload strategies.

This study expands upon the sparse literature on postdoctoral fellows by exploring factors that contribute to their perceived well-being and burnout, as well as provide suggestions to support their well-being. Findings contribute to the broader conversation of postdoctoral fellow well-being and burnout and informs the academy of focused strategies to improve their well-being and reduce burnout.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** GAD-7 (MESH:C000726808), imposter syndrome (MESH:C000711547), suicidal ideation (MESH:D001072), Burnout (MESH:D002055)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12994809/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12994809/full.md

## References

32 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12994809/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12994809