Correction: Perceptual consensus on cross-country ski–snow performance: a questionnaire study of experts and non-experts
Anton Kalén, Joakim Abrahamsson, Kalle Kalliorinne, Hans-Christer Holmberg, Andreas Almqvist
Abstract
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsWinter Sports Injuries and Performance · Sports Performance and Training · Adventure Sports and Sensation Seeking
1000 km was incorrectly written as “100 km”.
A correction has been made to the section 2 Materials and methods, 2.1 Study design and recruitment, Paragraph Number 2:
“A total of 249 participants completed the questionnaire. We categorised participants as experts (n = 20, 8%) if they met the following criteria:
• Over 500 ski preparations per year.
• Over 1,000 km of skiing per year.
• Reported a role as waxer.
The remaining participants were classified as non-experts (n = 229, 92%). This classification was established post-hoc in consultation with national team ski technicians from XC skiing and biathlon to ensure a sufficiently high threshold was established to be considered an expert.”
The original version of this article has been updated.