Advances and challenges in studying effects of EDCs on tissue-resident macrophages in inflammation
Margaret R Bell, Katherine A Walker, Gia M Valdez, Carissa E Dressel

Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
- —CACHET10.13039/501100023338
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsImmune cells in cancer · Cell Adhesion Molecules Research · Phagocytosis and Immune Regulation
Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) have long been studied as endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) and are associated with a range of disorders, including metabolic syndrome, reproductive dysfunction, and altered neurodevelopment [1]. The 200+ individual congeners differ in their mechanisms of action, as coplanar “dioxin-like” congeners bind aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) while non-coplanar compounds interact with a range of nuclear receptors, cellular proteins, and ion channels, and promote reactive oxygen species production. Because humans are exposed to mixtures of compounds, and a single congener can have several mechanisms, integration of endocrine disruption with other forms of toxicity is critical. Many PCB-associated health outcomes are associated with inflammation, which may be an intersection of multiple modes of action.
Macrophages are important innate immune cells that are responsive to a range of environmental contaminants, including persistent organic pollutants, heavy metals, and airborne particulate matter. In their recent research published in the Journal of the Endocrine Society, Behan-Bush et al study the effects of a widespread industrial PCB mixture called Arocolor 1254 on macrophages derived in vitro from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells [2]. They demonstrate that exposure to A1254 shifts macrophages into pro-inflammatory M1, and away from M2a and M2c anti-inflammatory, phenotypes. A strength of the work is the attention to the process of polarization by exposing cells to PCBs prior to and during addition of differentiating factors, as PCBs are likely already present in the tissues while they are developing or responding to inflammatory challenge. This complements the group's recent work showing that PCB mixtures can also shift previously differentiated cells toward inflammatory and away from anti-inflammatory states. Given the dynamic plasticity of macrophages, consideration of temporal and phenotype-specific processes is essential. Indeed, the authors illustrate that while effects of A1254 on surface receptor expression and cytokine release in M2a and M2c cells are dependent on AhR action, effects on glucose metabolism in M2c differentiated cells are not. One plausible explanation for this is the engagement of glucocorticoid receptor activity, as dexamethasone is used to drive the M2c phenotype. That the A1254 mixture appears to affect glucose metabolism via more than one molecular process affirms the challenges of studying PCBs and mixtures.
In addition to cytokine release, a key aspect of macrophage function is phagocytosis of pathogens, damaged cells, debris, or foreign particles for removal. Although phagocytosis was not directly measured in this study, several surface markers important in phagocytosis, such as CD14 and CD16, were altered by PCB exposure, suggesting a potential change in capacity. Defective macrophage phagocytosis is associated with cardiovascular and metabolic, pulmonary, and neurodevelopment and neurodegenerative disorders. Yet, how environmental contaminants reprogram phagocytic capacity remains unresolved and is an area for continued analysis.
Another strength of Behan-Bush's approach is the use of primary human monocyte-derived cells, as AhR signaling shows some species-specific processes. In addition, macrophage cells lines, an alternative model, do not always replicate primary responses to inflammatory and lipid signaling. Of course, using a diversity of models to understand the effects of environmental contaminants on health is essential, as each has strengths and limitations. In this publication, an in vitro model allows for testing A1254 mechanisms of action directly on macrophages, by preventing effects of exposure with AhR antagonists and demonstrating dose-dependent recapitulation of effects by coplanar PCB 126. At the same time, the study of PCBs on macrophage cell function in vivo allows for analysis to incorporate effects of PCBs in native tissues and interacting systems [3]. An additional strength of the model used by Behan-Bush is that individual patient cells were tested in parallel across treatment in a paired design. The authors provide details of patient demographics, which included male and female individuals of different ages. This may explain the variability in degree of response to treatment across samples and highlights the need for appropriately powered sex- and developmental period–specific analysis.
While Behan-Bush et al tested monocyte-derived macrophages as targets of PCBs, the contextual motivation behind these experiments concerns adipose-resident macrophages. Adipose tissue is recognized as a site of lipophilic toxicant accumulation and a target of obesogens [4]. Lipid droplets and the lipid species contained within can directly influence macrophage activity, including phagocytic efficiency. However, studies often focus on effects on adipocytes or systemic inflammation, rather than how EDCs directly reshape tissue-resident macrophage polarization, signaling, and downstream consequences [5]. Because adipose-immune signaling is a critical determinant of metabolic function in type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, understanding effects of contaminant exposure on local macrophages is key. As such, models that incorporate tailored differentiation protocols to include pro-inflammatory hypertrophic adipose-associated cytokines and lipids, co-culture with adipocytes or mesenchymal stem cells, or derivation of cells from specific patient adipose depots or disease states are uniquely powered to detect real-world effects of environmental contaminants on disease risk.
As Behan-Bush et al note, this published work has implications for other lipid-rich tissues like the brain. Like adipose tissue, the brain can serve as a reservoir for PCBs and is highly responsive to endocrine and immune signaling. The brain's resident macrophages, microglia, are also in constant conversation with neighboring cells and shift into a range of phenotypic states over development and in response to environmental challenges. While some studies do not detect major effects of PCB exposure on microglial function, designs that interrogate the effects of PCBs on later microglial responses to secondary challenges detect age- and sex-specific effects (eg, Walker et al, 2024 [6]). Recent findings regarding lipid signaling and crosstalk between brain and adipose tissues reveal further parallels and interactions. For example, lipid dysfunction in both adipose and brain macrophages are associated with disease [7] and microglial signaling can affect adipose tissue function in models of obesity [8]. Altogether, studies of environmental contaminant effects on tissue-resident macrophages that, like Behan-Bush et al, address cell plasticity and development provide insights relevant to a range of chronic disease processes.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Gore AC, Chappell VA, Fenton SE et al EDC-2: the endocrine society's second scientific statement on endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Endocr Rev. 2015;36(6):E 1‐E 150.26544531 10.1210/er.2015-1010 PMC 4702494 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Behan-Bush RM, Kilburg E, Liszewski JN et al Aroclor 1254 inhibits anti-inflammatory macrophage polarization through an Ah R-dependent mechanism. J Endocr Soc. 2025;10(2):bvaf 205.41541288 10.1210/jendso/bvaf 205PMC 12801039 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Wang C, Petriello MC, Zhu B, Hennig B. PCB 126 induces monocyte/macrophage polarization and inflammation through Ah R and NF-κB pathways. Toxicol Appl Pharm. 2019;367:71‐81.10.1016/j.taap.2019.02.006PMC 640259130768972 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4La Merrill MA, Smith MT, Mc Hale CM et al Consensus on the key characteristics of metabolism disruptors. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2025;21(4):245‐261.39613954 10.1038/s 41574-024-01059-8PMC 11916920 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Bansal A, Henao-Mejia J, Simmons RA. Immune system: an emerging player in mediating effects of endocrine disruptors on metabolic health. Endocrinology. 2018;159(1):32‐45.29145569 10.1210/en.2017-00882 PMC 5761609 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Walker KA, Rhodes ST, Liberman DA, Gore AC, Bell MR. Microglial responses to inflammatory challenge in adult rats altered by developmental exposure to polychlorinated biphenyls in a sex-specific manner. Neuro Toxicology. 2024;104:95‐115.39038526 10.1016/j.neuro.2024.07.009PMC 11548868 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Prakash P, Randolph CE, Walker KA, Chopra G. Lipids: emerging players of microglial biology. Glia. 2025;73(3):657‐677.39688320 10.1002/glia.24654 PMC 11784843 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Liu J, Zaidi A, Pike CJ. Microglia/macrophage-specific deletion of TLR-4 protects against neural effects of diet-induced obesity in a sexually dimorphic manner. J Neuroinflammation. 2025;22(1):214.41013506 10.1186/s 12974-025-03534-z PMC 12465214 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
