# Microbial hallmarks of the respiratory tract in lung cancer: a meta-analysis

**Authors:** Bin Zhu, Stephanie S. McHale, Michelle Van Scoyk, Gregory Riddick, Pei-Ying Wu, Chu-Fang Chou, Katherine Y. Tossas, Ching-Yi Chen, Robert A. Winn

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/frmbi.2025.1589686 · Frontiers in Microbiomes · 2025-07-01

## TL;DR

This study identifies specific microbial patterns in the respiratory tract that distinguish lung cancer patients from healthy individuals, with bronchoalveolar lavage samples showing the most significant differences.

## Contribution

The study reveals microbial hallmarks in bronchoalveolar lavage microbiota that distinguish lung cancer patients from healthy individuals, highlighting the importance of sample type in microbiome research.

## Key findings

- BAL microbiota from healthy individuals is dominated by Sphingomonas and Pseudomonas, while lung cancer patients show higher abundances of oral-associated taxa like Streptococcus and Prevotella.
- Compositional differences in BAL microbiota between healthy and lung cancer patients are more pronounced than in oral or lung tissue microbiota.
- Limited correlations exist between oral, BAL, and lung tissue microbiota, suggesting lower respiratory microbiota differences are not directly driven by upper respiratory microbiota.

## Abstract

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths and has been associated with the microbiota of the human respiratory tract. However, the optimal sample type for studying the role of microbiota in lung cancer and the microbial hallmarks of lung cancer patients remain unclear.

In this study, we downloaded 16S rRNA sequencing data of 1,105 high-quality samples from 13 BioProjects, including lung tissues, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluids, and saliva, and performed a meta-analysis.

Our results revealed that the BAL microbiota, dominated by taxa such as Sphingomonas and Pseudomonas, which are not typically abundant in the oral microbiota, served as hallmarks of individuals without lung cancer. In contrast, BAL samples from lung cancer patients showed higher relative abundances of oral-associated taxa, e.g., Streptococcus and Prevotella, with increased rates of dominance by these taxa in the BAL microbiota of lung cancer patients. Additionally, beta diversity analysis revealed significant compositional differences between the BAL microbiota of healthy individuals and those with lung cancer. Furthermore, while compositional differences were observed in the oral microbiota between healthy participants and lung cancer patients, as well as between microbiota from lung tumors and normal adjacent tissues, these differences were less pronounced than those observed in the BAL samples between healthy individuals and lung cancer patients. Cross-site correlations indicated limited associations between the relative abundances of taxa in the oral, BAL, and lung tissue microbiota, implying that differences in lower respiratory microbiota may not be directly driven by upper respiratory tract microbiota.

These findings highlight distinct microbial patterns linked to lung cancer in the respiratory tract. More pronounced differences were observed in the BAL microbiota between healthy individuals and lung cancer patients, with the predominance of taxa, typically not abundant in the oral microbiota, serving as hallmarks of health.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** lung cancer (MONDO:0005138)
- **Species:** Sphingomonas (taxon 13687), Pseudomonas (taxon 286), Streptococcus (taxon 1301), Prevotella (taxon 838)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** cancer (MESH:D009369), Lung cancer (MESH:D008175)
- **Species:** Prevotella (genus) [taxon 838], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Streptococcus (genus) [taxon 1301], Pseudomonas (RNA similarity group I, genus) [taxon 286], Sphingomonas (genus) [taxon 13687]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12993565/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12993565/full.md

## References

40 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12993565/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12993565