Correction: High-content screening (HCS) workflows for FAIR image data management with OMERO
Riccardo Massei, Wibke Busch, Beatriz Serrano-Solano, Matthias Bernt, Stefan Scholz, Elena K. Nicolay, Hannes Bohring, Jan Bumberger
Abstract
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCell Image Analysis Techniques · Research Data Management Practices · Scientific Computing and Data Management
Correction to: Scientific Reports 10.1038/s41598-025-00720-0, published online 09 May 2025
The original version of this Article contained errors in the captions of Figures 1, 2 4, 5 and 6;
The caption of Figure 1 was incorrectly given as:
An example of a local file-based storage system for HCS bioimaging. After image acquisition, data can be transferred to a shared repository. If additional metadata is available (e.g., information on experimental conditions or the biological sample), it can be added and transferred to the image storage location. From this location, data can be fetched to perform further analysis or be shared on public repositories (e.g., Image Data Repository (IDR), BioImage Archive (BIA)). The figure was created using to BioRender.
now reads:
An example of a local file-based storage system for HCS bioimaging. After image acquisition, data can be transferred to a shared repository. If additional metadata is available (e.g., information on experimental conditions or the biological sample), it can be added and transferred to the image storage location. From this location, data can be fetched to perform further analysis or be shared on public repositories (e.g., Image Data Repository (IDR), BioImage Archive (BIA)). The figure was created in BioRender. Massei, R. (2025) https://BioRender.com/g74o795.
The caption of Figure 2 was incorrectly given as:
A potential automated high content screening (HCS) for image data management workflow using a dedicated workflow management system integrated with OMERO. Image was created thanks to BioRender.
now reads:
A potential automated high content screening (HCS) for image data management workflow using a dedicated workflow management system integrated with OMERO. Image was Created in BioRender. Massei, R. (2025) https://BioRender.com/k21s891.
The caption of Figure 4 was incorrectly given as:
Two examples of workflows for OMERO upload using Galaxy and KNIME (Workflow 1). Testing datasets are available on the Broad Bioimage Benchmark Collection under the accession number BBBC014 (Ljosa et al., 2012). Image was created thanks to BioRender.
now reads:
Two examples of workflows for OMERO upload using Galaxy and KNIME (Workflow 1). Testing datasets are available on the Broad Bioimage Benchmark Collection under the accession number BBBC014 (Ljosa et al., 2012). “Image was created in BioRender. Massei, R. (2025) https://BioRender.com/xiy0tjb and https://BioRender.com/A69m173.
The caption of Figure 5 was incorrectly given as:
Overview on Workflow 2 “Zebrafish embryos HCS data analyzed with FishInspector”. Image was created thanks to BioRender.
now reads:
Overview on Workflow 2 “Zebrafish embryos HCS data analyzed with FishInspector”. Image was created Created in BioRender. Massei, R. (2025) https://BioRender.com/wewmfnw.
The caption of Figure 6 was incorrectly given as:
Overview on Workflow 3 “Nuclei segmentation of cell lines in Galaxy”. Image was created thanks to BioRender. A better overview of the workflow in higher resolution can be found at the WorkflowHub under the accession number 1259.
now reads:
Overview on Workflow 3 “Nuclei segmentation of cell lines in Galaxy”. Image was Created in BioRender. Massei, R. (2025) https://BioRender.com/8awy78c. A better overview of the workflow in higher resolution can be found at the WorkflowHub under the accession number 1259.
The original Article has been corrected.