# Risk-stratified surveillance after LEEP: a nomogram integrating HPV persistence, margin status, and clinical factors to predict CIN2+ recurrence

**Authors:** Haixia Shang, Xiaofeng Shi, Hongxin Yu, Yaqian Feng, Yue Huang, Nan Guo, Xin Guo, Qi Guo, Xiaoxue Wang, Jingfen Sun

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2026.1786335 · Frontiers in Oncology · 2026-03-03

## TL;DR

This study creates a tool to predict cervical cancer recurrence after a specific treatment, using factors like HPV infection and treatment margins.

## Contribution

A new nomogram integrating HPV persistence, margin status, and clinical factors for predicting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia recurrence after LEEP.

## Key findings

- Persistent HPV infection was the strongest predictor of CIN2+ recurrence after LEEP.
- The nomogram achieved improved model discrimination with a C-index of 0.619 in the final model.
- Risk stratification separated patients into low, intermediate, and high recurrence risk groups with distinct 24-month recurrence rates.

## Abstract

Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) recurrence after loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) remains a clinically consequential barrier to cervical cancer prevention, and risk stratification tools tailored to real-world practice are limited in China. This study developed and internally validated a clinical prediction nomogram for histologically confirmed CIN2+ recurrence after LEEP.

A retrospective single-center cohort was assembled of women treated with LEEP for CIN2+ between January 2018 and October 2024. Candidate predictors included demographic and reproductive factors, smoking, HPV vaccination, prior cervical treatment, transformation zone type, LEEP pathology (including adenocarcinoma in situ [AIS] and margin status), pre-/post-treatment high-risk HPV measures, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). Time-to-recurrence was analyzed using Cox regression with hierarchical domain modeling. A nomogram was constructed from the final multivariable model and evaluated for discrimination and calibration.

Among 2,230 women (median follow-up 31.8 months, IQR 19.6–43.5), 334 developed CIN2+ recurrence (15.0%), with a median time to recurrence of 15.6 months (IQR 8.2–24.3). Persistent HPV infection occurred in 50.6% of women with recurrence versus 23.1% without recurrence (p < 0.001). Persistent HPV infection (same genotype pre-/post-LEEP) was the strongest independent predictor (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.51, 95% CI 1.99–3.16). Additional independent predictors included unvaccinated status (aHR 1.54, 95% CI 1.08–2.20), multiple positive margins (aHR 1.52, 95% CI 1.08–2.14), AIS versus CIN2 (aHR 1.48, 95% CI 1.03–2.12), prior cervical treatment (aHR 1.38, 95% CI 1.04–1.84), single positive margin (aHR 1.38, 95% CI 1.02–1.87), and higher NLR (per one-unit increase: aHR 1.21, 95% CI 1.02–1.44). Model discrimination increased across hierarchical models from 0.516 (model 1) and 0.562 (model 3) to 0.619 in the final model. Risk stratification separated low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups with observed 24-month recurrence rates of 6.2%, 14.8%, and 31.5%, respectively (p for trend <0.001).

In a contemporary Chinese single-center cohort, genotype-defined persistent HPV infection and margin burden were dominant determinants of CIN2+ recurrence after LEEP, with vaccination status and NLR providing additional stratification. The resulting nomogram offers a pragmatic framework for risk-adapted surveillance, pending external multicenter validation.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** cervical cancer (MONDO:0002974)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** AIS (MESH:D013734), CIN (MESH:D002578), cervical cancer (MESH:D002583), HPV infection (MESH:D030361), adenocarcinoma in situ (MESH:D065311)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12992013/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12992013/full.md

## References

81 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12992013/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12992013