# Does active case finding detect TB early in programme settings? A national-level study in India

**Authors:** H.D. Shewade, S. Kiran Pradeep, P. Ravichandran, G. Kiruthika, A.N. Shah, B. Vadera, V. Roddawar, S.K. Mattoo, S. Iyer, D. Tumu, A. Chowdhury, S. Devika, J. Chadwick, R.R. Vaidya, P. Singh, S.K. Panda, M.A. Baig, K.V. Suma, M. Suleka, A.K. Digal, D. Banerjee, M.L. Prasanna, D.Y. Waghela, A. Krishnaraj, P. Kashyap, J.S. Parmar, C.K. Mishra, S. Das, A. Kumar, A. Kumar, S. Yadav, S. Chetry, A. Kumar, M. Pathak, S. Singh, S. Tabrez, P. Mehra, S. Ramesh, B. Bishnu, G. Mahesh, A. Rajesham, B.K. Mishra, U. Chandra Tripathi, K.U. Khayyam, K. Rade, R. Rao, M.V. Murhekar

PMC · DOI: 10.5588/pha.25.0044 · Public Health Action · 2026-03-06

## TL;DR

A study in India found that active case finding for TB did not significantly reduce pre-treatment delays or severe illness at diagnosis compared to passive methods.

## Contribution

The study evaluates the effectiveness of active case finding for TB detection in high-risk populations within program settings.

## Key findings

- ACF-detected TB patients had similar pre-treatment delays and severe illness rates as PCF-detected patients.
- ACF reduced healthcare provider visits but did not lead to earlier TB detection.
- High rates of severe illness at diagnosis remain a concern despite ACF implementation.

## Abstract

Since 2017, India’s TB programme is implementing active case finding (ACF) in high-risk populations in all districts. Symptom screening followed by confirmatory testing was the ACF algorithm.

To determine differences in pre-treatment delays and severe illness at diagnosis between ACF- and passive case finding (PCF)-detected adults with drug-sensitive pulmonary TB in high-risk populations.

Cross-sectional analytical study from 28 randomly sampled districts across India (2023). Post-triaging, severe illness was defined as presence of very severe undernutrition, respiratory insufficiency, or poor performance status.

Of 790 enrolled, 426 were ACF-detected and 364 PCF-detected. ACF-detected adults were significantly older (mean 47.1 year vs 43.9 year), lived farther from diagnosis facilities (median 8 km vs 6 km), had lower formal education exposure (52% vs 37% with no formal education), lower household income (₹20,000 vs ₹24,000 annual per capita), and experienced fewer health care provider visits (median 1 vs 2). Pre-treatment delay from symptom onset to treatment initiation (median 46 days in both groups) and burden of severe illness (39% vs 34%, P = 0.180) were similar.

Though ACF linked the vulnerable to care and reduced health care provider visits, this did not translate into early detection. High burden of severe illness at diagnosis is a concern.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** TB (MONDO:0018076)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** undernutrition (MESH:D044342), respiratory insufficiency (MESH:D012131), TB (MESH:D014390)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12991517/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12991517/full.md

## References

32 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12991517/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12991517