# Assessing the impact of timely diagnosis on psychological outcomes and quality of life for cancer patients: A scoping review

**Authors:** Laura Boswell, Jenny Harris, Richard Green, Jo Armes, Georgia B. Black, Katriina L. Whitaker, Ritesh G. Menezes, Ritesh G. Menezes, Ritesh G. Menezes, Ritesh G. Menezes, Ritesh G. Menezes

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0338136 · PLOS One · 2026-03-16

## TL;DR

This paper reviews how timely cancer diagnosis affects patients' mental health and quality of life, finding mixed evidence due to inconsistent study methods.

## Contribution

The study provides a scoping review highlighting the need for more consistent and high-quality research on timely cancer diagnosis and its psychological effects.

## Key findings

- Timely diagnosis is linked to better psychological outcomes and quality of life in cancer patients.
- Qualitative studies show an incidental relationship but do not focus on timely diagnosis.
- Definitions and measures of timely diagnosis vary widely across studies.

## Abstract

We explored the literature on timely cancer diagnosis and its significance on psychological outcomes or quality of life in cancer patients.

A scoping review to map existing literature in this area, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews.

Six studies were identified. Four studies used cross-sectional surveys, and one each used qualitative and mixed-method designs. Quantitative evidence suggests that timely diagnosis was associated with better psychological outcomes and quality of life. Qualitative and mixed-method evidence found an incidental relationship, but it was not a focus of the studies. There were varied definitions of timely diagnosis, and a diverse range of measures were used to identify outcomes. No study satisfied all quality appraisal criteria, with key dates in the diagnostic journey being the least reported (0/6 studies).

Preliminary evidence indicates that timely diagnosis may be associated with variations in psychological outcomes and quality of life in patients with cancer; however, methodological heterogeneity restricts the generalisability of the findings. More high-quality longitudinal quantitative and qualitative research is needed to explore the direction of the association and lived experience during the adjustment process.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** cancer (MONDO:0004992)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Colorectal cancer (MESH:D015179), nausea and vomiting (MESH:D020250), pain (MESH:D010146), depression (MESH:D003866), lung cancer (MESH:D008175), sarcoma (MESH:D012509), ovarian and endometrial cancer (MESH:D004714), COVID-19 (MESH:D000086382), anxiety (MESH:D001007), fatigue (MESH:D005221), breast, prostate, endometrial, ovarian, and sarcoma (MESH:D001943), Cancer (MESH:D009369), PTSD (MESH:D013313), Chronic Diseases (MESH:D002908)
- **Chemicals:** PONE-D-24-59414R3 (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12991267/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12991267/full.md

## References

64 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12991267/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12991267