# Hemiarthroplasty vs. proximal femoral nail fixation in unstable pertrochanteric fractures: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

**Authors:** Ming-Ming Zhang, Shuang-Shuang Yuan, Hong-Hua Dong, Chao Wang

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2026.1782908 · Frontiers in Surgery · 2026-03-02

## TL;DR

This study compares hemiarthroplasty and proximal femoral nail fixation for treating unstable hip fractures, finding similar outcomes in most areas but some advantages for each method.

## Contribution

The study provides an updated meta-analysis comparing hemiarthroplasty and proximal femoral nails for unstable pertrochanteric fractures.

## Key findings

- Hemiarthroplasty showed better early hip function and lower implant-related complications.
- Proximal femoral nails had shorter surgery times and fewer superficial infections.
- No significant differences were found in mortality, re-operation rates, or long-term hip function.

## Abstract

Pertrochanteric fractures are common and challenging for surgeons, especially in unstable conditions. Proximal femoral nails or nails anti-rotation variants are well-established surgical instruments to treat this, but some reports suggest that in unstable situations, hemiarthroplasty provides superior benefits to patients. This study aimed to compare hemiarthroplasty with proximal femoral nails, highlighting the differences to assist surgical decision-making.

Online databases were searched for eligible studies in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Results were analyzed across 18 domains, categorized into three branches: function, complication, and perioperative condition and mortality. Effect sizes were calculated, and the heterogeneities thereof were analyzed. We also tested sensitivity, publication biases, and graded certainty of evidence. Finally, comprehensive results were interpreted.

Twenty-seven studies, with a total of 2,517 patients, were included. The hemiarthroplasty performed better than nails in early Harris hip scores, full weight-bearing time, and complication rate related to implants. Proximal femoral nails performed better in terms of surgery duration and superficial infection. No significant differences were observed in final Harris hip scores, general and implant-unrelated complications, mortality, hospital stay, re-operation incidence, bedsores, and deep venous thrombosis. Ambulation time, blood loss, and transfusion incidence showed potential publication bias.

Hemiarthroplasty and proximal femoral nails/nails anti-rotation are effective methods for treating unstable pertrochanteric fractures. No clinically important differences—such as re-operation rates due to implant-related complications—were identified between these two tactics. Surgeons should prioritize internal fixations, barring conditions wherein hemiarthroplasty is essential.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** Pertrochanteric fractures (MESH:D050723), blood loss (MESH:D016063), infection (MESH:D007239), deep venous thrombosis (MESH:D020246)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12989514/full.md

## Figures

12 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12989514/full.md

## References

54 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12989514/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12989514