# Changes in nuclear and actin mechanics from G1 to G2 affect nuclear integrity

**Authors:** Samantha Bunner, Katie Huang, Anish Shah, Schuyler Figueroa, Nick Lang, Catherine Chu, Nebiyat Eskndir, Mai Pho, Gianna Manning, Mindy Zheng, Lilian Fritz-Laylin, Katrina B. Velle, Joshua Marcus, James Orth, Andrew D. Stephens

PMC · DOI: 10.1242/jcs.264118 · Journal of Cell Science · 2026-03-04

## TL;DR

This study shows that changes in nuclear and actin mechanics during the cell cycle affect nuclear stiffness and blebbing, impacting nuclear integrity.

## Contribution

The paper reveals that G1 nuclei are stiffer than G2 nuclei, and actin-based confinement causes blebbing in G1.

## Key findings

- G1 nuclei are stiffer than G2 nuclei in both chromatin-based and lamin-based stiffness regimes.
- Nuclear blebs form predominantly in G1 and persist into G2, linked to increased actin-based confinement.
- Loss of peripheral H3K9me3 from G1 to G2 explains decreased nuclear stiffness.

## Abstract

The structural integrity of the nucleus is dependent on nuclear mechanical elements of chromatin and lamins resisting antagonistic actin cytoskeleton forces. Force imbalance results in nuclear blebbing, rupture and cellular dysfunction found in many human diseases. Here, we used the fluorescent ubiquitin cell cycle indicator (FUCCI) cells to determine how cell cycle changes affect the nucleus and actin force balance. Whereas nuclear blebs were present equally throughout interphase, nuclear blebs formed predominantly in G1 and then persisted into G2. Actin-based nuclear confinement and focal adhesion density was greater in G1 versus G2 cells. Removal of focal adhesions through treatment with an inhibitor resulted in decreased nuclear confinement and blebbing, supporting this as the underlying mechanism. Upon artificial confinement, G2 nuclei ruptured more than G1 nuclei. Single nucleus micromanipulation force measurements confirmed that G1 nuclei were stiffer than G2 nuclei in both the chromatin-based and lamin-based nuclear stiffness regimes. Decreased nuclear stiffness can be explained by loss of peripheral H3K9me3 from G1 to G2, recapitulated by H3K9me3 inhibition through treatment with chaetocin. Cell cycle-based changes in nuclear and actin mechanics impact nuclear integrity and shape.

Summary: Measurements of nuclear blebbing, rupture, spring constant and actin-based confinement across interphase stages show that G1 nuclei are stiffer than G2 nuclei, but increased actin confinement leads to nuclear bleb formation in G1.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** chaetocin (PubChem CID 11657687)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** LMNA (lamin A/C) [NCBI Gene 4000] {aka CDCD1, CDDC, CMD1A, CMT2B1, EMD2, FPL}
- **Chemicals:** Chaetocin (MESH:C002511)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12989073/full.md

## Figures

7 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12989073/full.md

## References

70 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12989073/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12989073