# An assessment of Nigeria’s microlivestock value chain: insights from six species

**Authors:** Dolapo Enahoro, Oladeji Bamidele, Dare Akerele, Olusegun O. Ojebiyi, Adetunji O. Iyiola-Tunji, Wasiu A. Olaniyi, Joseph Karugia, Isabelle Baltenweck

PMC · DOI: 10.1007/s11250-026-04960-8 · Tropical Animal Health and Production · 2026-03-14

## TL;DR

The study explores the microlivestock value chains in Nigeria, highlighting challenges and opportunities for improving incomes and nutrition.

## Contribution

This study provides a mixed-methods assessment of six microlivestock species' value chains in Nigeria, offering insights for policy and development.

## Key findings

- Microlivestock farming is a primary livelihood for some farmers, but many engage in multiple economic activities.
- Farmer association membership varies significantly across species, with rabbits, honeybees, and grasscutters showing higher rates.
- Persistent challenges include limited access to feed, veterinary services, and market linkages, alongside gender and youth barriers.

## Abstract

Microlivestock farming offers potential to improve incomes and nutrition in Nigeria, yet the subsector remains fragmented and underdeveloped. There is, in addition, a lack of reliable data to support value-chain-wide development. This study presents an explorative, mixed-methods assessment of the value chains of six microlivestock species commonly raised in Nigeria. The study was conducted in six purposively selected states: Oyo (rabbits), Anambra (grasscutters), Ondo (snails), Katsina (guinea fowl), Plateau (quail), and Kwara (honeybees), spanning five agroecological zones, integrating data from questionnaire surveys (n = 114), gender-disaggregated focus group discussions (n = 120), and key informant interviews (n = 18). Microlivestock production was the primary source of livelihood for 10% (honeybees) to 33.3% (grasscutter) of farmers sampled. Across the value chains, the proportions of surveyed farmers engaged in multiple economic activities ranged from 10.0% (guinea fowl) to 88.9% (quail), indicating the supplementary role of microlivestock to household incomes. Farmer association membership was highest among rabbit (95%), honeybee (70%), and grasscutter (61.1%) farmers. In comparison, farmers of guinea fowl (10.0%), quail (17.0%), and snail (27.8%) in the sample had lower rates of association membership. The farmers reported persistent challenges, including limited access to specialized feed and veterinary services, and weak market linkages. The study participants also reported gender disparities and barriers to youth participation in microlivestock value chains, despite high youth interest. The study identified strategic opportunities in the formation of cooperatives, digital marketing, e-commerce, species-specific extension, and supporting youth-led enterprises. The findings underscore the need for gender-sensitive, youth-inclusive policies and programs, alongside species-targeted interventions in the subsector. This assessment provides evidence to support current livestock policies and strategies, as well as the integration of microlivestock into broader livestock reform agendas.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11250-026-04960-8.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** NPC (MESH:D052556), FGDs (MESH:D003057)
- **Chemicals:** sugar syrups (-), royal jelly (MESH:C058787), oil (MESH:D009821), wax (MESH:D014885), essential oils (MESH:D009822)
- **Species:** Coturnix japonica (Japanese quail, species) [taxon 93934], Capra hircus (domestic goat, species) [taxon 9925], Apis mellifera (bee, species) [taxon 7460], Bos taurus (bovine, species) [taxon 9913], Coturnix coturnix (Common quail, species) [taxon 9091], Oryctolagus cuniculus (domestic rabbit, species) [taxon 9986], Numida meleagris (helmeted guineafowl, species) [taxon 8996], Gallus gallus (bantam, species) [taxon 9031], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Numididae sp. (species) [taxon 8997], Thryonomys swinderianus (greater cane rat, species) [taxon 10169], Archachatina marginata (species) [taxon 145442]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12989003/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12989003/full.md

## References

18 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12989003/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12989003