# Reliability of electric field simulations in different age groups: impact of data quality metrics

**Authors:** Dayana Hayek, Axel Thielscher, Ulrike Grittner, Agnes Flöel, Daria Antonenko

PMC · DOI: 10.1186/s40708-026-00293-2 · Brain Informatics · 2026-02-22

## TL;DR

This study shows that MRI image quality affects electric field simulations used in brain stimulation, with older adults having lower simulation accuracy but still reliable enough for treatment adjustments.

## Contribution

The study introduces a method to assess how MRI quality metrics influence electric field simulations in different age groups.

## Key findings

- Lower MRI image quality in older adults correlates with reduced simulated electric field magnitudes.
- Electric field simulations remain reliable for older adults despite lower image quality.
- Age-related differences in electric field strength persist even after accounting for image quality and head volume.

## Abstract

Electric field simulations based on individualized Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-derived head models are increasingly used to optimize non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) protocols, enabling individualized dose adjustments to achieve a desired current flow at cortical targets. However, the quality of structural MRI data—affected by motion artefacts, tissue contrast, and scanner-related noise—may influence the accuracy of these simulations, an issue possibly exacerbated in older adults who often exhibit lower image quality. If reduced image quality compromises electric field estimation, it could limit the feasibility of individualized dosing in aging populations. In this study, we examined whether standardized image quality metrics—entropy focus criterion (EFC), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), spatial resolution (FWHM), and intensity non-uniformity (INU)—systematically relate to the magnitude of simulated electric fields in young and older adults. We analysed MRI and simulation data of a focal C3 montage from 106 healthy adults, 47 young adults (mean age: 24.8, age range: 20–35 years) and 59 older adults (mean age: 69.5 years, age range: 60–79) using SimNIBS for computational modelling of the electric fields and MRIQC for image quality assessment. Structural equation modelling was used to quantify direct and indirect effects of age group on electric field magnitude, with image quality as a mediating factor. Head volume was included in extended models to control for anatomical variation. Our findings demonstrate that MR image quality is associated with simulated electric field magnitude, with higher EFC, lower SNR, lower CNR, and higher INU associated with reduced field estimates, and older adults showing generally lower simulated electric fields compared to younger adults. While image quality accounted for some of the age-related differences in electric field strength, group differences remained even after controlling for EFC, SNR and head volume. Critically, electric field simulations remained sufficiently reliable despite lower image quality in older adults, supporting their use for individualized dose adjustment across the lifespan.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40708-026-00293-2.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** brain atrophy (MESH:C566985), fat (MESH:D004620), neurodegenerative disease (MESH:D019636), psychiatric (MESH:D001523)
- **Chemicals:** TH (MESH:D013910), water (MESH:D014867)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12988111/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12988111/full.md

## References

2 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12988111/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12988111