# Almond Allergy in Children and Adults: A Narrative Review of Current Knowledge, Clinical Challenges, and Research Gaps

**Authors:** Tudini Laura, Colletti Giorgio, Iavarone Sonia, Moraca Paola, Brindisi Giulia, Zicari Anna Maria, Anania Caterina

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/nu18050831 · Nutrients · 2026-03-04

## TL;DR

Almond allergy is uncommon despite frequent sensitization, with challenges in diagnosis and variable clinical outcomes.

## Contribution

This review highlights the rarity of clinically confirmed almond allergy and the limitations of current diagnostic methods.

## Key findings

- Clinically confirmed almond allergy is uncommon despite high sensitization rates.
- Oral food challenge (OFC) remains essential for diagnosis due to limited predictive value of conventional tests.
- OFC positivity varies by age, ethnicity, and almond processing methods.

## Abstract

Background: Almond is one of the most widely consumed tree nuts worldwide; however, almond allergy remains poorly characterized. Despite frequent sensitization, the prevalence of clinically relevant almond allergy appears low, contributing to diagnostic uncertainty. This review summarizes current evidence on the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, and diagnostic challenges of almond allergy. Methods: A narrative review was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and UpToDate databases. Studies reporting almond-specific data on epidemiology, diagnostics, molecular allergens, and oral food challenge (OFC) outcomes were included. Results: Across heterogeneous studies, clinically confirmed almond allergy appears to be uncommon despite high rates of sensitization, particularly among patients with atopic dermatitis and concomitant tree nut allergy. In sensitized individuals, OFC positivity ranges from 4% to 33%, with anaphylaxis and severe reactions reported in 0.5–12.2% of challenged patients. Conventional diagnostic tests, including skin prick testing and almond-specific IgE, demonstrate limited predictive value, with no reliable cut-off levels for predicting clinical reactivity. Consequently, OFC remains essential for definitive diagnosis. Clinical outcomes vary according to age, ethnicity, and almond processing, with lower OFC positivity observed in pediatric cohorts and reduced reactivity to processed almond products. Conclusions: Almond allergy is relatively rare despite frequent sensitization. Improved almond-specific molecular diagnostics may enhance risk stratification and reduce unnecessary dietary avoidance.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** atopic dermatitis (MONDO:0004980)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** atopic dermatitis (MESH:D003876), anaphylaxis (MESH:D000707), tree nut allergy (MESH:D021184), Almond Allergy (MESH:D004342)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Prunus dulcis (almond, species) [taxon 3755]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12986931/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12986931/full.md

## References

69 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12986931/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12986931