# Extraction, Characterization and Applications of Biopolymers from Sustainable Sources

**Authors:** Elena Hurtado-Fernández, Luis A. Trujillo-Cayado, Paloma Álvarez-Mateos, Jenifer Santos

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/polym18050581 · Polymers · 2026-02-27

## TL;DR

This review explores sustainable biopolymers, their extraction methods, and applications, highlighting challenges and future directions for reducing environmental impact.

## Contribution

The paper provides a comprehensive analysis of recent advances in biopolymer extraction and processing from diverse renewable sources.

## Key findings

- Greener extraction methods like ultrasound and supercritical CO2 show promise but face scalability and energy challenges.
- Biopolymers lag in barrier and thermal properties compared to petrochemical plastics, limiting their adoption.
- AI-guided optimization and circular strategies are emerging as key solutions for improving biopolymer sustainability.

## Abstract

Biopolymers from renewable sources are increasingly explored to reduce the carbon footprint of materials and mitigate plastic pollution. This review synthesizes the last five years of progress across the biopolymer value chain, comparing plant, microbial/fermentation, fungal, and marine/algal resources and critically assessing greener extraction and fractionation routes (ultrasound and microwave intensification, subcritical water, supercritical CO2 with co-solvents, ionic liquids, deep eutectic solvents including natural deep eutectic solvents, and enzymatic or bio-mediated processes). We emphasize yield-selectivity trade-offs, scalability, energy demand, and solvent recovery. Downstream, we summarize purification and performance tuning via crosslinking, derivatization, blending/plasticization, and nanocomposites, and we map advanced characterization to targeted functional properties to bridge processing choices with end-use performance. Applications are organized across food and agriculture, biomedical and pharmaceutical technologies, packaging, and cosmetics, with cross-cutting attention to safety and regulatory compliance, quality-by-design, techno-economics, and life-cycle assessment. Key bottlenecks are feedstock variability, viscosity and recyclability limitations of designer solvents, and persistent gaps in barrier and thermal properties versus petrochemical benchmarks, compounded by uneven composting and recycling infrastructure. Promising directions include low-viscosity or switchable solvents, data- and artificial intelligence (AI)-guided process optimization, engineered biopolymers, and circular end-of-life strategies that align material design with realistic recovery routes.

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** CO2 (MESH:D002245), Biopolymers (MESH:D001704), water (MESH:D014867), carbon (MESH:D002244)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12986599/full.md

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12986599/full.md

## References

164 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12986599/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12986599