Low-Contrast Coating Surface Microcrack Detection Using an Improved U-Net Network Based on Probability Map Fusion
Junwen Xue, Wuzhi Chen, Shida Zhang, Xukun Yang, Keji Pang, Jiaojiao Ren, Lijuan Li, Haiyan Li

TL;DR
A new U-Net-based method improves microcrack detection on low-contrast surfaces, achieving high accuracy and robustness in aerospace and energy applications.
Contribution
The novel ImF-Att-Do-U-net method combines preprocessing and network improvements to detect microcracks as small as 7 μm with high reliability.
Findings
The method achieved a Dice coefficient of 0.884, SSIM of 0.893, and accuracy of 0.911, outperforming existing models.
It detected cracks as small as 7 μm with a recognition rate >85% and had a 98% extraction rate for cracks ≥10 μm.
Multi-stage preprocessing and optimized network modules improved anti-interference ability under noise and blur.
Abstract
What are the main findings? The proposed ImF-Att-Do-U-net method achieved excellent detection performance—a Dice coefficient of 0.884, SSIM of 0.893, and accuracy of 0.911—outperforming comparative models. It detected cracks as small as 7 μm (recognition rate >85%) and had a 98% extraction rate for cracks ≥10 μm.The multi-stage preprocessing (contrast enhanced by over four times) and optimized network modules (CBAM, DO-Conv, and Leaky ReLU) enhanced anti-interference ability, maintaining stable performance under noise and blur. The proposed ImF-Att-Do-U-net method achieved excellent detection performance—a Dice coefficient of 0.884, SSIM of 0.893, and accuracy of 0.911—outperforming comparative models. It detected cracks as small as 7 μm (recognition rate >85%) and had a 98% extraction rate for cracks ≥10 μm. The multi-stage preprocessing (contrast enhanced by over four times) and…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsInfrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring · Numerical methods in engineering · Advanced Neural Network Applications
