# Deterministic Pilot Risk–Benefit Assessment of Latvian Inland Fish: Safe Weekly Consumption Guidance

**Authors:** Janis Rusko, Elizabete Murniece, Santa Sibule, Ilva Lazda, Dzintars Zacs, Ruta Medne, Inese Siksna

PMC · DOI: 10.3390/foods15050901 · Foods · 2026-03-05

## TL;DR

This study assesses the safe weekly consumption of Latvian inland fish by balancing nutritional benefits against contaminant risks.

## Contribution

A deterministic framework for lake- and species-specific fish consumption guidance integrating contaminant risks and nutritional benefits.

## Key findings

- Mercury was the main constraint for predatory fish consumption, while PFAS limited some lower-mercury groups.
- EPA + DHA provided the strongest benefit signal, but iodine contributions were limited due to measurement constraints.
- The framework can be updated as monitoring data expands, offering adaptable consumption guidance.

## Abstract

Fish consumption provides nutritional benefits but can also contribute to exposures to bioaccumulative contaminants, requiring guidance that integrates both dimensions. We conducted a deterministic pilot risk–benefit assessment of Latvian inland lake fish using pooled samples stratified by lakes and species. Risks were characterized for methylmercury, estimated from total mercury, and for Σ4 PFAS (PFOS, PFOA, PFNA, PFHxS) by calculating weekly intakes under three consumption scenarios (150, 300, and 450 g/week) for a 70 kg adult and comparing them to health-based guidance values. Benefits were quantified as weekly contributions of EPA + DHA, iodine, and protein relative to reference intakes, combined into a nutritional index and integrated with risk using a benefit–risk quotient (BRQ). The primary decision outputs were safe weekly consumption amounts (g/week) and the contaminant limiting factor. Across lake-species groups, mercury was the dominant constraint on safe consumption for most predatory fish, while PFAS limited selected groups with lower mercury burdens. EPA + DHA provided the strongest differentiating benefit signal between groups, whereas iodine contribution was limited because measurements were left-censored and constant after limit of quantification (LOQ) handling. This pilot demonstrates an interpretable framework for generating lake- and species-specific consumption guidance that can be updated as monitoring coverage expands.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** methylmercury (PubChem CID 6860), PFOS (PubChem CID 74483), PFOA (PubChem CID 9554), PFNA (PubChem CID 67821), PFHxS (PubChem CID 67734), EPA (PubChem CID 446284), DHA (PubChem CID 15608515), iodine (PubChem CID 807)

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** iodine (MESH:D007455), PFAS (-), mercury (MESH:D008628), PFOA (MESH:C023036), DHA (MESH:C027493), PFOS (MESH:C076994)

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12984848/full.md

## Figures

8 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12984848/full.md

## References

26 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12984848/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12984848