Cross-cultural validation and reliability of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire in a Danish population
Frederik Foldager, Christine Krogsgaard Schrøder, Tatiana Jensen, Line Gangelhof Lauritsen, Janne Hastrup Jensen, Linette Marie Kofod, Jeanett Guldager Olsen, Benedicte Mechlenburg, Arietta Spinou, William Poncin, Inger Mechlenburg

TL;DR
The study validated a Danish version of the Leicester Cough Questionnaire, showing it is reliable for measuring cough-related quality of life in Danish patients.
Contribution
The study provides a cross-culturally validated Danish version of the LCQ for clinical and research use.
Findings
The LCQ-DK showed excellent internal consistency with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.96 for the total score.
Test–retest reliability was high with an ICC of 0.90 for the total score.
The questionnaire had no significant floor or ceiling effects for the total score.
Abstract
Chronic cough markedly impairs health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) is widely used to assess cough burden across physical, psychological, and social domains; however, no validated Danish version is available. The LCQ was translated and culturally adapted into Danish in accordance with COSMIN guidelines and was approved by the original developers. Forty-two clinically stable patients with chronic cough (mean age 70.8 years; 67% male) completed baseline and retest questionnaires at a median of 28 days (IQR 21–42). Internal consistency was examined with Cronbach’s alpha. Test–retest reliability was assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), standard error of measurement (SEM), and minimal detectable change (MDC). The LCQ-DK demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.96 total; 0.84–0.92 domains). Test–retest…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRespiratory and Cough-Related Research · Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research · Asthma and respiratory diseases
