International survey in four European countries on diagnostic reference levels based on clinical indications in computed tomography
Alexander A. Schegerer, Kerstin Jungnickel, Michael Walz, Michael Verius, Julian Singer, Bernhard Renger, Nadia Oberhofer, Constance Müller, Roman Menz, Bärbel Madsack, Martin Fiebich, Rainer Eßeling, Markus Borowski, Babak Bazrafshan, Josefin Ammon, Christoph Aberle, Georg Stamm

TL;DR
This study establishes radiation dose benchmarks for 23 CT procedures across four European countries to improve consistency and safety in medical imaging.
Contribution
The study introduces clinical task-based diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for 23 CT procedures in four European countries.
Findings
Median dose values for the same procedures varied by up to a factor of 39 between CT systems.
Approximately a third of systems met the proposed DRLs, while 6% did not meet any.
Dose variations were mainly due to differences in protocol optimization rather than country, manufacturer, or scanner age.
Abstract
To collect and analyze radiation dose metrics from 23 commonly performed CT procedures, for which no national DRLs have yet been defined, as part of an international cooperation. The body region, the clinical task, and the relevant technical parameters were considered to define clinical diagnostic reference levels (DRLs). During 2022–2023, a multicenter study was performed in Austria, Germany, Italy, and Switzerland. Healthcare providers supplied processed data from their dose management systems. The 5%-level was used to assess the statistical significance of dose differences between the countries of participants, as well as age and manufacturer of the scanners. Dose metrics from 87 CT systems in academic and non-academic, public and private healthcare facilities were analyzed. Dose values from the same body region but for different clinical tasks and/or using different techniques…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsRadiation Dose and Imaging · Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging · Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
