Metacognitive awareness and confidence as predictors of academic performance in pharmacy students: insights from grade predictions and structural equation modeling
Rihaf Alfaraj, Burhanettin Ozdemir, Lobna Aljuffali, Jawza F. Alsabhan, Noha Al Aloola, Hadeel Alkofide, Rana Aljadeed, Raniah Aljadeed, Faten Alodaib, Nora Alkhudair, Haya M. Almalag, Ghada A. Bawazeer, Lamya S. Alnaim, Njoud Altuwaijri

TL;DR
Pharmacy students with better self-awareness and realistic confidence tend to perform better academically, according to a study using surveys and statistical analysis.
Contribution
This study empirically links metacognitive awareness and confidence to academic performance in pharmacy education using structural equation modeling.
Findings
Students with higher metacognitive awareness and calibrated confidence scored significantly higher on exams.
Metacognitive cognition and confidence were positively correlated with academic performance (r = 0.467 and 0.361).
Male students showed higher confidence and metacognitive cognition scores compared to female students.
Abstract
Pharmacy students often struggle with accurate self-assessment of learning outcomes. Many students overestimate exam performance, reflecting poor metacognitive awareness and overconfidence. This study examined the relationships between metacognitive awareness, self-confidence in grade predictions, and academic performance in pharmacy education, thus addressing how these factors interact without inferring causation. Pharmacy students (n = 151) at King Saud University participated in this study while enrolled in a Pathophysiology, Drug Action, and Therapeutics course. Surveys were pre-tested and post-tested twice at two midterm examinations to determine their self-reported metacognitive awareness and confidence. Students made predictions for future course grades. These self-tests were then contrasted to actual exam scores. Statistical analysis was performed using R software version…
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods · Student Assessment and Feedback · Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
