Monitoring bacterial contamination of blood components at the Croatian Institute of Transfusion Medicine—Evolution of strategies and results in a 14‐year period (2011–2024)
Ivanka Batarilo, Mia Slade‐Vitkovic, Lidija Rukavina, Jadranka Gulan Harcet, Julijana Ljubicic, Adrijana Grdic, Marko Karlo Radovcic, Matea Vinkovic, Irena Jukic, Tomislav Vuk

TL;DR
This study tracks bacterial contamination rates in blood components at a Croatian transfusion center over 14 years, showing how testing strategies evolved and how contamination rates compare to other studies.
Contribution
The study provides a detailed 14-year analysis of bacterial contamination trends and testing strategy evolution in blood components in Croatia.
Findings
Bacterial contamination rate was 0.09% for quality control testing and 0.18% after universal screening implementation.
Cutibacterium acnes was the most frequently detected organism in contaminated blood components.
Testing strategies evolved to include universal screening for platelets using methods like large-volume delayed sampling.
Abstract
This study presents the results and experiences of bacterial testing of blood components (BCs) at the Croatian Institute of Transfusion Medicine during the period 2011–2024. During the 14‐year period, 74,283 BCs were tested. Among these, 20,231 components (8345 red blood cell concentrates, 5729 platelet concentrates [PCs] and 6157 plasma units) were tested as part of statistical quality control (QC). In addition, 100% bacterial screening was implemented for aphaeresis platelets in November 2019 and for pooled platelets in October 2022 with 17,187 aphaeresis platelets and 36,865 pooled platelets tested by the end of 2024. All pooled platelets were tested using the large‐volume delayed sampling (LVDS) method, whereas 9596 aphaeresis platelets were tested using the two‐step method (from November 2019 to November 2022) and 7591 using LVDS (from November 2022 to December 2024). BCs were…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBlood transfusion and management · Blood donation and transfusion practices · Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
