Cure rate estimation with insufficient follow-up: A median-based bootstrap correction approach
Yumiko Ibi, Takashi Omori

TL;DR
This paper introduces a new method to estimate cure rates in clinical trials when follow-up data is limited.
Contribution
The novel approach uses a median-based bootstrap correction to reduce bias in cure rate estimation.
Findings
The proposed method showed smaller variation due to outliers compared to existing methods.
It enabled stable estimation of cure rates in clinical trials with insufficient follow-up.
The method was successfully applied to real data from a primary biliary cirrhosis study.
Abstract
The cure rate in clinical trials can be estimated using the Kaplan–Meier (KM) estimator. However, when the clinical trial follow-up period is insufficient and short, the KM estimator may overestimate the proportion of cured patients. Although a correction method was proposed by Escobar-Bach and Keilegom based on bootstrap sampling, this can also lead to bias when the bootstrap distribution is skewed. We propose a median-based approach for bootstrap samples to address these issues. Simulation results showed that the effect of the variation of the proposed method due to many outliers was smaller than that of the other method and enabled stable estimation. The method was successfully applied to real clinical trial data from a D-penicillamine study on primary biliary cirrhosis.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18
Figure 19
Figure 20
Figure 21
Figure 22
Figure 23
Figure 24
Figure 25
Figure 26
Figure 27
Figure 28
Figure 29
Figure 30
Figure 31
Figure 32
Figure 33
Figure 34
Figure 35
Figure 36
Figure 37
Figure 38
Figure 39
Figure 40
Figure 41
Figure 42
Figure 43
Figure 44
Figure 45
Figure 46
Figure 47
Figure 48
Figure 49
Figure 50Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsStatistical Methods and Inference · Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials · Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
