An Fc-silent OspA monoclonal antibody passively protects mice from tick and intradermal Borrelia burgdorferi challenge
Daniel Palmer, Atieh Shemshadian, Katherine Berman, Ariana Nobles, Graham G. Willsey, Carol Lyn Piazza, Grace Freeman-Gallant, Michael J. Rudolph, Jeff Bourgeois, Linden Hu, David J. Vance, Nicholas J. Mantis, Brian Stevenson, Brian Stevenson, Brian Stevenson

TL;DR
A modified antibody that does not activate the immune system's complement system still protects mice from Lyme disease, suggesting protection comes from direct antibody interactions with the bacteria.
Contribution
Demonstrates that complement-independent mechanisms are sufficient for passive protection against Borrelia burgdorferi.
Findings
An Fc-silent version of LA-2 retains OspA binding but lacks complement-dependent activity.
The Fc-silent antibody protects mice against tick and intradermal Borrelia challenge as effectively as the original.
Protection correlates with direct spirochete interactions rather than complement activation.
Abstract
The monoclonal antibody, LA-2, has played a pivotal role in the development of Outer surface protein A (OspA)-based vaccines for Lyme disease, a multisystem illness caused by the tick-borne spirochete, Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato. Of particular significance was the demonstration more than three decades ago that LA-2 equivalent antibody titers, defined by a competitive-inhibition ELISA, serve as a reliable correlate of vaccine-induced protection across different species, including humans. In vitro characterization of LA-2 has identified both complement-dependent and -independent activities, although which of these attributes contribute to protection against B. burgdorferi remains unresolved. To address this issue, we generated and characterized an “Fc-silent” version of LA-2 IgG1 carrying so-called LALAPG substitutions (L234A, L235A, P329G). We demonstrate that LA-2 LALAPG retained…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsVector-borne infectious diseases · vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches · Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
