# Examining changes in the prevalence of cost‐motivated alcohol reduction attempts in the context of a cost‐of‐living crisis and alcohol duty reforms: A population survey of risky drinkers in Great Britain, 2021–2024

**Authors:** Sarah E. Jackson, Jamie Brown, Colin Angus, Abi Stevely, Magdalena Opazo Breton, Leonie Brose, Luke Wilson, John Holmes

PMC · DOI: 10.1111/add.70248 · Addiction (Abingdon, England) · 2025-11-19

## TL;DR

This study found that more risky drinkers in Great Britain tried to cut back on alcohol due to rising costs during a financial crisis and tax changes, though overall reduction attempts stayed about the same.

## Contribution

The study tracks how financial pressures and tax reforms influenced cost-motivated alcohol reduction attempts among risky drinkers over time.

## Key findings

- The monthly prevalence of cost-motivated alcohol reduction attempts increased from 4.6% in 2021 to 7.0% in 2024.
- Cost became a more common motive for alcohol reduction attempts, rising from 12.4% to 19.7% of all such attempts.
- Overall alcohol reduction attempts remained stable despite the increase in cost-motivated attempts.

## Abstract

Affordability of alcohol is a key driver of consumption. The cost‐of‐living crisis in Great Britain has been putting pressure on household budgets since late 2021. In addition, the UK Government implemented substantial reforms to the alcohol duty system and increased alcohol taxes in 2023. This study aimed to estimate changes in the monthly prevalence of cost‐motivated alcohol reduction attempts among risky drinkers over this period.

Data were drawn from the Alcohol Toolkit Study, a nationally representative monthly cross‐sectional household survey.

Great Britain.

26 212 risky drinkers [alcohol use disorders identification test – consumption (AUDIT‐C) score ≥5] aged ≥18y surveyed between January 2021 and December 2024 [mean (SD) age = 45.9 (17.1); 61.4% men].

The primary outcome was having tried to reduce alcohol consumption in the past year due to a decision that drinking was too expensive (‘cost‐motivated alcohol reduction attempt’). This included participants who also reported other motives (e.g. health concerns) for trying to reduce their consumption.

Overall, 1355 participants reported making a cost‐motivated alcohol reduction attempt. The monthly weighted prevalence of cost‐motivated alcohol reduction attempts among risky drinkers increased from 4.6% in January 2021 to 7.0% in December 2024 [prevalence ratio (PR) = 1.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.34–1.74]; equating to ~1.1 million people attempting to reduce their drinking among risky drinkers in 2024. This was primarily driven by a rise in the proportion of all alcohol reduction attempts that were motivated by cost, from 12.4% to 19.7% (PR = 1.58, 95% CI = 1.39–1.77), rather than an overall increase in the prevalence of alcohol reduction attempts (which remained relatively stable across the period at an average of 36.0%). The pattern of results was similar when the outcome was restricted to alcohol reduction attempts only motivated by cost [17.3% (95% CI = 15.0–19.7%) of all cost‐motivated alcohol reduction attempts].

During a period of increasing financial pressures in Great Britain, alcohol reduction attempts were increasingly motivated by cost but the overall prevalence of reduction attempts did not increase.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** alcohol use disorders (MESH:D000437)
- **Chemicals:** Alcohol (MESH:D000438)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12980291/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12980291/full.md

## References

50 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12980291/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12980291