The genome sequence of the Brindled Green, Dryobotodes eremita (Fabricius, 1775)
Douglas Boyes, Peter W.H. Holland, Woo Jae Kim, Xinyue Zhou, Zekun Wu, Tree of Life Team Sanger, Kay Lucek

TL;DR
This paper reports the genome sequence of the Brindled Green moth, including its chromosomes and mitochondrial DNA.
Contribution
The study provides a high-quality genome assembly and gene annotation for Dryobotodes eremita.
Findings
The genome assembly spans 709.8 megabases and includes 32 chromosomal pseudomolecules.
Gene annotation identified 19,706 protein coding genes using Ensembl.
The mitochondrial genome is 15.5 kilobases in length.
Abstract
We present a genome assembly from an individual female Dryobotodes eremita (the Brindled Green; Arthropoda; Insecta; Lepidoptera; Noctuidae). The genome sequence is 709.8 megabases in span. Most of the assembly is scaffolded into 32 chromosomal pseudomolecules including the Z and W sex chromosomes. The mitochondrial genome has also been assembled and is 15.5 kilobases in length. Gene annotation of this assembly on Ensembl identified 19,706 protein coding genes.
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5| Project accession data | ||
|---|---|---|
| Assembly identifier | ilDryErem1.1 | |
| Species |
| |
| Specimen | ilDryErem1 | |
| NCBI taxonomy ID | 988106 | |
| BioProject | PRJEB46319 | |
| BioSample ID | SAMEA8603190 | |
| Isolate information | ilDryErem1, female: thorax (genome sequencing), head (Hi-C
| |
| Assembly metrics
|
| |
| Consensus quality (QV) | 61.2 |
|
|
| 100% |
|
| BUSCO
| C:99.0%[S:98.7%,D:0.4%],
|
|
| Percentage of assembly mapped to chromosomes | 99.8% |
|
| Sex chromosomes | Z and W chromosomes |
|
| Organelles | Mitochondrial genome assembled |
|
| Raw data accessions | ||
| PacificBiosciences SEQUEL II | ERR6808003 | |
| 10X Genomics Illumina | ERR6688525–ERR6688528 | |
| Hi-C Illumina | ERR6688524 | |
| PolyA RNA-Seq Illumina | ERR9435006 | |
| Genome assembly | ||
| Assembly accession | GCA_917490735.1 | |
|
| GCA_917490515.1 | |
| Span (Mb) | 709.8 | |
| Number of contigs | 104 | |
| Contig N50 length (Mb) | 22.6 | |
| Number of scaffolds | 67 | |
| Scaffold N50 length (Mb) | 23.3 | |
| Longest scaffold (Mb) | 35.1 | |
|
| ||
| Number of protein-coding genes | 19,706 | |
| Number of transcripts | 19,901 | |
| INSDC accession | Chromosome | Size (Mb) | GC% |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 29.33 | 38.1 | |
| 2 | 26.44 | 37.9 | |
| 3 | 25.13 | 37.7 | |
| 4 | 24.83 | 38.1 | |
| 5 | 24.77 | 38 | |
| 6 | 24.73 | 38.1 | |
| 7 | 24.58 | 37.6 | |
| 8 | 24.22 | 37.8 | |
| 9 | 23.99 | 38.1 | |
| 10 | 23.83 | 37.7 | |
| 11 | 23.47 | 37.7 | |
| 12 | 23.46 | 37.6 | |
| 13 | 23.33 | 38.1 | |
| 14 | 23.26 | 38 | |
| 15 | 23.21 | 38 | |
| 16 | 23.05 | 38 | |
| 17 | 22.99 | 37.7 | |
| 18 | 22.07 | 38.2 | |
| 19 | 22.01 | 38.1 | |
| 20 | 21.97 | 38 | |
| 21 | 21.65 | 38 | |
| 22 | 21.02 | 38.4 | |
| 23 | 20.32 | 38 | |
| 24 | 19.94 | 37.7 | |
| 25 | 18.97 | 38.3 | |
| 26 | 17.46 | 38.1 | |
| 27 | 14.54 | 38.6 | |
| 28 | 12.95 | 39.4 | |
| 29 | 15.84 | 38.5 | |
| 30 | 14.09 | 39.3 | |
| W | 2.52 | 38.1 | |
| Z | 35.08 | 37.9 | |
| MT | 0.02 | 20.3 | |
| - | unplaced | 14.73 | 41.6 |
| Software tool | Version | Source |
|---|---|---|
| BlobToolKit | 4.0.7 |
|
| BUSCO | 5.3.2 |
|
| FreeBayes | 1.3.1-17-gaa2ace8 |
|
| Hifiasm | 0.15.3-r339 |
|
| HiGlass | 1.11.6 |
|
| Long Ranger ALIGN | 2.2.2 |
|
| Merqury | MerquryFK |
|
| MitoHiFi | 2 |
|
| PretextView | 0.2 |
|
| purge_dups | 1.2.3 |
|
| SALSA | 2.2 |
|
- —Wellcome Trust
- —Wellcome Trust
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies · Insect symbiosis and bacterial influences · Lepidoptera: Biology and Taxonomy
Species taxonomy
Eukaryota; Metazoa; Ecdysozoa; Arthropoda; Hexapoda; Insecta; Pterygota; Neoptera; Endopterygota; Lepidoptera; Glossata; Ditrysia; Noctuoidea; Noctuidae; Xyleninae; Dryobotodes; Dryobotodes eremita (Fabricius, 1775) (NCBI:txid988106).
Background
The Brindled Green, Dryobotodes eremita, is a small moth in the family Noctuidae (wingspan 32–39 mm) with a distinctive crinkled appearance to the forewings which are patterned with patches of green, black and cream overlain with rosy streaks. The variegated colouration extends to the thorax, head and legs such that the moth is cryptic when resting on lichen-covered tree trunks. The extent of green and red coloration is variable ( Bretherton et al., 1983).
D. eremita is found across Europe and further east into Russia ( GBIF Secretariat, 2022). The species has an extensive distribution in Britain being found in woodland, parks and gardens across England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland. Records range from Cornwall and the Scilly Isles in the south to Orkney and Shetland in the far north, although it is more common in the south of this range ( NBN Atlas Partnership, 2021). In Ireland the moth has been recorded across much of the country ( MothsIreland, 2022). The moth is on the wing in September and October in the south of England, or August and September in central and northern Scotland, and can be attracted to light or sugary substances ( Bretherton et al., 1983; Randle et al., 2019). Eggs are laid in autumn on pedunculate oak Quercus robur and when larvae hatch from eggs in spring they bore into an oak leaf-bud to feed. As the larvae develop, they switch to feeding on young leaves at terminal shoots ( Bretherton et al., 1983; Stokoe, 1948). The species name eremita, meaning ‘hermit’, refers to the habit of the young larva living in a chamber formed by spinning oak leaves together with silk ( Emmet, 1991); later instars feed on oak leaves openly. Pupation occurs in soil near the base of oak trees ( Stokoe, 1948).
A genome sequence for Dryobotodes eremita will facilitate studies investigating molecular adaptations to oak feeding and will contribute to the growing set of genomic resources for Lepidoptera.
Genome sequence report
The genome was sequenced from one female Dryobotodes eremita ( Figure 1) collected from Wytham Woods, UK (latitude 51.77, longitude –1.34). A total of 28-fold coverage in Pacific Biosciences single-molecule HiFi long reads and 55-fold coverage in 10X Genomics read clouds were generated. Primary assembly contigs were scaffolded with chromosome conformation Hi-C data. Manual assembly curation corrected 40 missing joins or mis-joins and removed 10 haplotypic duplications, reducing the assembly length by 0.83% and the scaffold number by 33.66%, and increasing the scaffold N50 by 0.78%.
Photograph of the Dryobotodes eremita (ilDryErem1) specimen used for genome sequencing.
The final assembly has a total length of 709.8 Mb in 67 sequence scaffolds with a scaffold N50 of 23.3 Mb ( Table 1). Most (99.8%) of the assembly sequence was assigned to 32 chromosomal-level scaffolds, representing 30 autosomes, and the W and Z sex chromosome. Chromosome-scale scaffolds confirmed by the Hi-C data are named in order of size ( Figure 2– Figure 5; Table 2). While not fully phased, the assembly deposited is of one haplotype. Contigs corresponding to the second haplotype have also been deposited. The mitochondrial genome was also assembled and can be found as a contig within the multifasta file of the genome submission.
Table 1.: Genome data for Dryobotodes eremita, ilDryErem1.1.
Genome assembly of Dryobotodes eremita, ilDryErem1.1: metrics.The BlobToolKit Snailplot shows N50 metrics and BUSCO gene completeness. The main plot is divided into 1,000 size-ordered bins around the circumference with each bin representing 0.1% of the 709,806,353 bp assembly. The distribution of scaffold lengths is shown in dark grey with the plot radius scaled to the longest scaffold present in the assembly (35,077,990 bp, shown in red). . Orange and pale-orange arcs show the N50 and N90 scaffold lengths (23,327,181 and 15,843,934 bp), respectively. The pale grey spiral shows the cumulative scaffold count on a log scale with white scale lines showing successive orders of magnitude. The blue and pale-blue area around the outside of the plot shows the distribution of GC, AT and N percentages in the same bins as the inner plot. A summary of complete, fragmented, duplicated and missing BUSCO genes in the lepidoptera_odb10 set is shown in the top right. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/ilDryErem1.1/dataset/CAKJSZ01.1/snail.
Genome assembly of Dryobotodes eremita, ilDryErem1.1: BlobToolKit GC-coverage plot.Scaffolds are coloured by phylum. Circles are sized in proportion to scaffold length. Histograms show the distribution of scaffold length sum along each axis. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/ilDryErem1.1/dataset/CAKJSZ01.1/blob.
Genome assembly of Dryobotodes eremita, ilDryErem1.1: BlobToolKit cumulative sequence plot.The grey line shows cumulative length for all scaffolds. Coloured lines show cumulative lengths of scaffolds assigned to each phylum using the buscogenes taxrule. An interactive version of this figure is available at https://blobtoolkit.genomehubs.org/view/ilDryErem1.1/dataset/CAKJSZ01.1/cumulative.
Genome assembly of Dryobotodes eremita, ilDryErem1.1: Hi-C contact map of the ilDryErem1.1 assembly, visualised using HiGlass.Chromosomes are shown in order of size from left to right and top to bottom. An interactive version of this figure may be viewed at https://genome-note-higlass.tol.sanger.ac.uk/l/?d=a-aARzNPStu0F6GjMD60XA.
Table 2.: Chromosomal pseudomolecules in the genome assembly of Dryobotodes eremita, ilDryErem1.
The estimated Quality Value (QV) of the final assembly is 61.2 with k-mer completeness of 100%, and the assembly has a BUSCO v5.3.2 completeness of 99.0% (single = 98.7%, duplicated = 0.4%), using the lepidoptera_odb10 reference set ( n = 5,286).
Metadata for specimens, spectral estimates, sequencing runs, contaminants and pre-curation assembly statistics can be found at https://links.tol.sanger.ac.uk/species/988106.
Genome annotation report
The Dryobotodes eremita genome assembly GCA_917490735.1 was annotated using the Ensembl rapid annotation pipeline ( Table 1; https://rapid.ensembl.org/Dryobotodes_eremita_GCA_917490735.1/Info/Index). The resulting annotation includes 19,901 transcribed mRNAs from 19,706 protein-coding genes.
Methods
Sample acquisition and nucleic acid extraction
A female Dryobotodes eremita (specimen number Ox000959, ToLID ilDryErem1) was collected from Wytham Woods, Oxfordshire (biological vice-county: Berkshire), UK (latitude 51.77, longitude –1.34) on 8 September 2020. The specimen was taken from woodland habitat by Douglas Boyes (University of Oxford) using a light trap. The specimen was identified by the collector and snap-frozen on dry ice.
DNA was extracted at the Tree of Life laboratory, Wellcome Sanger Institute (WSI). The ilDryErem1 sample was weighed and dissected on dry ice with head tissue set aside for Hi-C sequencing. Thorax tissue was cryogenically disrupted to a fine powder using a Covaris cryoPREP Automated Dry Pulveriser, receiving multiple impacts. High molecular weight (HMW) DNA was extracted using the Qiagen MagAttract HMW DNA extraction kit. Low molecular weight DNA was removed from a 20 ng aliquot of extracted DNA using the 0.8X AMpure XP purification kit prior to 10X Chromium sequencing; a minimum of 50 ng DNA was submitted for 10X sequencing. HMW DNA was sheared into an average fragment size of 12–20 kb in a Megaruptor 3 system with speed setting 30. Sheared DNA was purified by solid-phase reversible immobilisation using AMPure PB beads with a 1.8X ratio of beads to sample to remove the shorter fragments and concentrate the DNA sample. The concentration of the sheared and purified DNA was assessed using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer and Qubit Fluorometer and Qubit dsDNA High Sensitivity Assay kit. Fragment size distribution was evaluated by running the sample on the FemtoPulse system.
RNA was extracted from abdomen tissue of ilDryErem1 in the Tree of Life Laboratory at the WSI using TRIzol, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA was then eluted in 50 μl RNAse-free water and its concentration assessed using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer and Qubit Fluorometer using the Qubit RNA Broad-Range (BR) Assay kit. Analysis of the integrity of the RNA was done using Agilent RNA 6000 Pico Kit and Eukaryotic Total RNA assay.
Sequencing
Pacific Biosciences HiFi circular consensus and 10X Genomics read cloud DNA sequencing libraries were constructed according to the manufacturers’ instructions. Poly(A) RNA-Seq libraries were constructed using the NEB Ultra II RNA Library Prep kit. DNA and RNA sequencing was performed by the Scientific Operations core at the WSI on Pacific Biosciences SEQUEL II (HiFi), Illumina HiSeq 4000 (RNA-Seq) and Illumina NovaSeq 6000 (10X) instruments. Hi-C data were also generated from head tissue of ilDryErem1 using the Arima v2 kit and sequenced on the Illumina NovaSeq 6000 instrument.
Genome assembly, curation and evaluation
Assembly was carried out with Hifiasm ( Cheng et al., 2021) and haplotypic duplication was identified and removed with purge_dups ( Guan et al., 2020). One round of polishing was performed by aligning 10X Genomics read data to the assembly with Long Ranger ALIGN, calling variants with FreeBayes ( Garrison & Marth, 2012). The assembly was then scaffolded with Hi-C data ( Rao et al., 2014) using SALSA2 ( Ghurye et al., 2019). The assembly was checked for contamination as described previously ( Howe et al., 2021). Manual curation was performed using HiGlass ( Kerpedjiev et al., 2018) and Pretext ( Harry, 2022). The mitochondrial genome was assembled using MitoHiFi ( Uliano-Silva et al., 2022), which runs MitoFinder ( Allio et al., 2020) or MITOS ( Bernt et al., 2013) and uses these annotations to select the final mitochondrial contig and to ensure the general quality of the sequence. To evaluate the assembly, MerquryFK was used to estimate consensus quality (QV) scores and k-mer completeness ( Rhie et al., 2020). The genome was analysed within the BlobToolKit environment ( Challis et al., 2020) and BUSCO scores ( Manni et al., 2021; Simão et al., 2015) were calculated. Table 3 contains a list of software tool versions and sources.
Genome annotation
The BRAKER2 pipeline ( Brůna et al., 2021) was used in the default protein mode to generate annotation for the Dryobotodes eremita assembly (GCA_917490735.1). in Ensembl Rapid Release.
Ethics and compliance issues
The materials that have contributed to this genome note have been supplied by a Darwin Tree of Life Partner. The submission of materials by a Darwin Tree of Life Partner is subject to the Darwin Tree of Life Project Sampling Code of Practice. By agreeing with and signing up to the Sampling Code of Practice, the Darwin Tree of Life Partner agrees they will meet the legal and ethical requirements and standards set out within this document in respect of all samples acquired for, and supplied to, the Darwin Tree of Life Project. All efforts are undertaken to minimise the suffering of animals used for sequencing. Each transfer of samples is further undertaken according to a Research Collaboration Agreement or Material Transfer Agreement entered into by the Darwin Tree of Life Partner, Genome Research Limited (operating as the Wellcome Sanger Institute), and in some circumstances other Darwin Tree of Life collaborators.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Allio R Schomaker-Bastos A Romiguier J : Mito Finder: Efficient automated large-scale extraction of mitogenomic data in target enrichment phylogenomics. Mol Ecol Resour. 2020;20(4):892–905. 10.1111/1755-0998.13160 32243090 PMC 7497042 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Bernt M Donath A Jühling F : MITOS: Improved de novo metazoan mitochondrial genome annotation. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2013;69(2):313–319. 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.08.023 22982435 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Bretherton RF Goater B Lorimer RI : Noctuidae: Cucullinae to Hypeninae.In: J. Heath and A.M. Emmet (eds) The Moths and Butterflies of Great Britain and Ireland. Colchester: Harley Books. 1983.
- 4Brůna T Hoff KJ Lomsadze A : BRAKER 2: Automatic eukaryotic genome annotation with Gene Mark-EP+ and AUGUSTUS supported by a protein database. NAR Genom Bioinform. 2021;3(1):lqaa 108. 10.1093/nargab/lqaa 108 33575650 PMC 7787252 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Challis R Richards E Rajan J> : Blob Tool Kit - interactive quality assessment of genome assemblies. G 3 (Bethesda). 2020;10(4):1361–1374. 10.1534/g 3.119.400908 32071071 PMC 7144090 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Cheng H Concepcion GT Feng X : Haplotype-resolved de novo assembly using phased assembly graphs with hifiasm. Nat Methods. 2021;18(2):170–175. 10.1038/s 41592-020-01056-5 33526886 PMC 7961889 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 7Emmet AM : The Scientific Names of the British Lepidoptera - their History and Meaning.Colchester: Harley Books. 1991. Reference Source
- 8Garrison E Marth G : Haplotype-based variant detection from short-read sequencing. 2012. 10.48550/ar Xiv.1207.3907 · doi ↗
