# The utility of pelvic lymph node dissection in PSMA-PET negative intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer patients undergoing radical prostatectomy

**Authors:** Giuseppe Reitano, R. Jeffrey Karnes, Giacomo Novara, Daniel S. Roberson, Mohamed E. Ahmed, Filippo Carletti, Umar Ghaffar, Giuseppe Dinoi, Salvatore Carrozza, Maurizio Bentivoglio, Simone Botti, Carlo Prevato, Giovanni Betto, Fabio Zattoni, Fabrizio Dal Moro

PMC · DOI: 10.1007/s00345-026-06330-3 · World Journal of Urology · 2026-03-11

## TL;DR

This study finds that adding lymph node dissection during prostate cancer surgery increases complications but does not improve early cancer outcomes in PSMA-PET negative patients.

## Contribution

The study provides new evidence on the clinical utility of PLND in PSMA-PET negative prostate cancer patients undergoing robotic radical prostatectomy.

## Key findings

- PLND increased high-grade complications and lymphoceles without improving biochemical recurrence-free survival.
- No significant differences in recurrence sites were observed between PLND and no-PLND groups.
- Short-term follow-up showed no oncological benefit from performing PLND in this patient cohort.

## Abstract

To compare perioperative and early oncological outcomes of robotic radical prostatectomy (RP) with and without extended pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) in a cohort of intermediate (IR)-to-high-risk (HR) prostate cancer (PCa) patients.

Data was prospectively collected from 88 patients (47 PLND, 41 no-PLND) with unfavorable intermediate- and high-risk miN0M0 PCa, all staged preoperatively with PSMA-PET/CT. Outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves, uni-and multivariable Cox regression, for biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCRFS) and biochemical failure-free survival (BCFFS). A propensity score matched analysis with Cox regression was undertaken matching 1:1 for potential confounders (age, iPSA, preoperative ISUP, cT stage at MRI).

Both groups (PLND and no-PLND) had the same proportion of HR patients (p = 1.0). The no-PLND group had a shorter median operative time by 50 min (p < 0.01). Conversely, the PLND group experienced significantly higher rates of 90-day high-grade complications (p = 0.03) and lymphoceles (p < 0.01). Over a median 20.5-month follow-up, no significant differences emerged in BCRFS (p = 0.59) or BCFFS (p = 0.76). Uni- and multivariable analyses adjusted for UCSF CAPRA and CAPRA-S variables, as well as propensity score matching, confirmed PLND was not associated with improved BCFFS. In patients who did recur, the sites of recurrence did not differ between the two groups (p = 0.62), with pelvic nodal recurrence being the most common site of recurrence in both groups (6, 50% for PLND and 3, 60% for no-PLND).

In this short-term follow-up, performing PLND increased high-grade postoperative complications without providing a clear early oncological benefit regarding BCRFS, PSA persistence, or recurrence location.

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00345-026-06330-3.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** prostate cancer (MONDO:0005159)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** FOLH1 (folate hydrolase 1) [NCBI Gene 2346] {aka FGCP, FOLH, GCP2, GCPII, NAALAD1, PSM}, NPEPPS (aminopeptidase puromycin sensitive) [NCBI Gene 9520] {aka AAP-S, MP100, PSA}
- **Diseases:** lymphoceles (MESH:D008210), PCa (MESH:D011471)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12979355/full.md

## Figures

2 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12979355/full.md

## References

3 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12979355/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12979355