# Sensitivity of microbial spatial self-organization to surface friction depends on metabolic interactions

**Authors:** Philipp Tandler, David R Johnson, Guram Gogia

PMC · DOI: 10.1093/ismejo/wrag035 · 2026-02-19

## TL;DR

Microbial spatial patterns are more sensitive to environmental conditions when cells interact positively, like cross-feeding, compared to when they compete.

## Contribution

A new framework to quantify spatial intermixing and its sensitivity to environmental and biotic factors in microbial ecosystems.

## Key findings

- Positive interactions like cross-feeding lead to spatial patterns more sensitive to environmental changes.
- High dispersal and strong biotic interdependence promote persistent spatial intermixing.
- Spatial intermixing strength can indicate ecosystem sensitivity to environmental conditions.

## Abstract

Self-organizing spatial patterns are ubiquitous in microbial ecosystems, yet their sensitivity to environmental conditions remains poorly understood. Understanding spatial pattern sensitivity is particularly relevant for surface-associated microbial systems, as their functioning depends on how different cell-types self-organize across space as a consequence of their traits and environmental conditions. Here, we integrate principles from microbial systems ecology with self-organization theory to understand how environmental conditions and biotic interactions shape the sensitivity of emergent spatial intermixing, which is a critical feature of spatial patterns. Using denitrifying strains of the bacterium Stutzerimonas stutzeri that engage in negative (competitive) or positive (cross-feeding) interactions, we demonstrate that spatial intermixing emerging from positive interactions is more sensitive to environmental conditions than that emerging from negative interactions. We further develop and quantify the spatial intermixing strength as a key descriptor of spatial pattern sensitivity, revealing that high short-range dispersal and strong biotic interdependence promote persistent spatial intermixing. Our findings highlight that ecosystem sensitivity to environmental conditions can be inferred from features of emergent spatial patterns, providing a quantitative framework for understanding how environmental and biological factors jointly govern ecosystem assembly and dynamics.

## Linked entities

- **Species:** Stutzerimonas stutzeri (taxon 316)

## Full-text entities

- **Genes:** CFP (complement factor properdin) [NCBI Gene 5199] {aka BFD, PFC, PFD, PROPERDIN}
- **Diseases:** water loss (MESH:D000069578)
- **Chemicals:** nitrate (MESH:D009566), oxygen (MESH:D010100), IPTG (-), agar (MESH:D000362), NaNO2 (MESH:D012977), NO2- (MESH:D009585), N2 (MESH:D009584), nitrite (MESH:D009573), N2O (MESH:D009609), nitrogen oxides (MESH:D009589), water (MESH:D014867), NaNO3 (MESH:C031618), NO (MESH:D009569), NaOH (MESH:D012972), argon (MESH:D001128), gentamicin (MESH:D005839), NO3- (MESH:C038619), hydrogen (MESH:D006859)
- **Species:** Stutzerimonas stutzeri (species) [taxon 316]
- **Cell lines:** S2 — Drosophila melanogaster (Fruit fly), Spontaneously immortalized cell line (CVCL_Z232)

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12978657/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12978657