Using reinforcement algorithms to improve the collaboration efficiency of entrepreneurial teams
Jieqiong Wang, Linghong Jiang

TL;DR
This paper explores using reinforcement learning to enhance the efficiency of entrepreneurial teams in dynamic environments.
Contribution
It introduces a MARL-based approach to improve collaboration, resource use, and task allocation in entrepreneurial teams.
Findings
MARL improved resource utilization and communication efficiency in entrepreneurial teams.
PPO-based agents achieved higher task completion rates in dynamic scenarios.
The method showed adaptability across software development, manufacturing, and logistics cases.
Abstract
Entrepreneurial Team (ET) plays an essential role in the business process by driving innovation and optimizing ideas via adaptability, collaboration, and resourcefulness. The team performance is continuously affected because of resource imbalance, poor communication and inefficient task allocation. The importance of ET in organization growth is the main reason for this analysis. Therefore, this work uses Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) to handle efficient dynamic decisions and coordination to improve ET efficiency in dynamic and complex environments. The main intention of this work is to improve resource utilization, communication efficiency and optimize task allocation. During the analysis, Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) is utilized to direct agents toward achieving collaborative goals. In every state, the agent receives rewards and penalties for their actions, which…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18
Figure 19
Figure 20
Figure 21
Figure 22
Figure 23
Figure 24
Figure 25
Figure 26
Figure 27
Figure 28
Figure 29
Figure 30
Figure 31
Figure 32
Figure 33
Figure 34
Figure 35
Figure 36
Figure 37
Figure 38
Figure 39
Figure 40
Figure 41
Figure 42
Figure 43
Figure 44
Figure 45
Figure 46
Figure 47
Figure 48
Figure 49
Figure 50Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsMobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing · Open Source Software Innovations · Advanced Multi-Objective Optimization Algorithms
