Healthy school recognized campus: design and methodology of a hybrid type 2 implementation-effectiveness cluster randomized trial

TL;DR

This study tests a school-based health program and a mentoring strategy to improve student health and program implementation in public schools.

Contribution

The study introduces a dual randomized trial design to assess both health outcomes and implementation strategies in school-based programs.

Findings

HSRC will be evaluated for its impact on BMI z-score and physical activity in students.

School-to-school mentoring will be tested for its effect on program implementation outcomes.

A mixed-methods approach will assess the mentoring strategy's effectiveness.

Abstract

About one-third of U.S. youth are overweight and most have at least one risk factor that increases their chance of developing cardiovascular or other chronic diseases. School- and research-based physical activity and healthy eating programs can reduce obesity and improve health outcomes; however, schools face many implementation challenges. Healthy School Recognized Campus (HSRC) bundles school- and researched-based programs to improve their implementation and student health outcomes. This paper describes the protocol for a hybrid type 2 implementation-effectiveness, cluster dual randomized controlled trial that evaluates the (aim 1) effectiveness of the HSRC initiative for improving health behaviors and (aim 2) the impact of an implementation strategy – school-to-school mentoring – on HSRC’s delivery.

Students in 4th through 9th grade (n = 500) at public schools (n = 20) across East and Central Texas will be randomized at the school level to determine the effectiveness of HSRC (vs. waitlist control condition) on BMI z-score (primary outcome), physical activity measured via accelerometer, and skin carotenoids (i.e., fruit and vegetable intake; secondary outcomes). Assessments will occur at the start and end of one school year. Program implementers (n = 200) at schools will be randomized to assess the impact of the school-to-school mentoring strategy (vs. standard implementation) on HSRC’s acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility (co-primary outcomes). Assessments will occur at the start, middle, and end of one school year. The assessment at the end of the school year will also include a concurrent mixed-methods approach (QUAL + QUAN), guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), to evaluate the school-to-school mentoring strategy. For quantitative outcomes, a generalized linear model framework will be used to evaluate HSRC and the school-to-school mentoring strategy.

This study’s innovative dual randomized design allows for rigorous assessment of HSRC on effectiveness outcomes and the evaluation of a school-to-school mentoring implementation strategy on implementation outcomes. If both HSRC and the school-to-school mentoring strategy have their hypothesized effect, we will be well positioned to address cardiovascular and other chronic disease risk factors among youth using a scalable, widely used approach within one of the largest health educator networks in the country.

Clinicaltrials.gov on July 1, 2025 (NCT07079995).

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13012-026-01487-2.

Figures