SCANDARE: an institutional dynamic prospective interventional biobanking study
Constance Lamy, Léonard Laurent, Olivier Choussy, Nicolas Pouget, Fabrice Lecuru, Fabien Reyal, Anne-Sophie Plissonnier, Amir Kadi, Frédérique Berger, Joey Martin, Antoine Dubray-Vautrin, Grégoire Marret, Edith Borcoman, Emanuela Romano, Marie-Paule Sablin, Luc Cabel

TL;DR
SCANDARE is a biobanking study that collects tumor and blood samples from cancer patients to support research in personalized medicine.
Contribution
The study introduces a dynamic, multicenter biobanking framework that integrates clinical and omics data for translational cancer research.
Findings
SCANDARE successfully collected and preserved tumor and blood samples from over 676 patients.
The study enabled high-quality data integration for 35 ongoing research projects.
Optimized workflows improved regulatory compliance and sample collection logistics.
Abstract
We set up a prospective longitudinal biobanking study answering scientific questions within a regulatory framework and patient-centered approach. We aim in this paper to present the opportunities of such a study, as well as the challenges and the limitations. SCANDARE (NCT03017573) is an institutional first monocentric then multicentric biobanking study. The study enrolled adult patients with newly diagnosed head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, triple negative breast cancer, ovarian and cervical cancer. All patients signed a consent form before any procedure. Tumor tissue and blood samples are collected at several time points during patient's journey, including at diagnosis, post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy in case of neoadjuvant treatment, at surgery, at recurrence and at disease progression following treatment initiated at recurrence. Clinical data are entered into an eCRF, whereas…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBreast Cancer Treatment Studies · Ethics in Clinical Research · HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research
