# Variations in Ionospheric Parameters Associated With the 20–21 May 2012 Annular and 21 August 2017 Total Solar Eclipses

**Authors:** Manghang Limbu, Samyam Pudasaini, Sujan Prasad Gautam, Binod Adhikari, Ashok Silwal, Iva Kumari Lamichhane, Rohit Bhattarai, Pitri Bhakta Adhikari

PMC · DOI: 10.1155/tswj/5547996 · 2026-03-11

## TL;DR

This study examines how two solar eclipses in 2012 and 2017 affected the Earth's ionosphere, finding significant changes in electron content and layer heights.

## Contribution

The paper provides new insights into how annular and total solar eclipses differentially impact ionospheric parameters like foF2, hmF2, and TEC.

## Key findings

- Total solar eclipses caused significant reductions in foF2 and TEC (up to 38%) and notable hmF2 uplift (~20 km).
- Annular eclipses showed smaller effects, with foF2 and TEC reductions of ~15–25% and negligible hmF2 changes.
- Recovery times for foF2 were longer than for TEC, possibly due to transport-driven F2-layer dynamics.

## Abstract

This study investigates the ionospheric effects of the annular solar eclipse (20–21 May 2012) and total solar eclipse (21 August 2017) across midlatitude stations, analyzing critical parameters: F2‐layer critical frequency (foF2), peak height (hmF2), and total electron content (TEC). Using ionosonde data and geomagnetic indices, we isolated eclipse‐driven perturbations by comparing observations with quiet‐day baselines. Both eclipses induced significant reductions in foF2 and TEC (~30%–38% during totality and 15%–25% during annularity), with pre‐eclipse transient enhancements, which might be attributed to traveling ionospheric disturbances (TIDs). The total eclipse caused a notable hmF2 uplift (~20 km), whereas the annular eclipse showed negligible changes, reflecting different thermospheric cooling magnitudes for eclipses with different magnitude and obscuration rates. Stations under higher obscuration (e.g., Idaho, 100%) experienced stronger depletions, supporting the role of eclipse magnitude. Recovery times for foF2 (1–3 h) exceeded TEC restoration, which might be due to transport‐driven F2‐layer dynamics. Although noticeable variation is observed on foF2 and TEC parameters, their magnitudes are found to vary with local time, latitude, and obscuration rate. These findings emphasize the ionosphere′s layered sensitivity to solar forcing and have implications for GNSS and communication systems vulnerable to TEC fluctuations.

## Figures

31 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12976980/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12976980