Feasibility of applying computerized adaptive testing to the Clinical Medical Science Comprehensive Examination in Korea: a psychometric study
Jeongwook Choi, Sung-Soo Jung, Eun Kwang Choi, Kyung Sik Kim, Dong Gi Seo

TL;DR
This study shows that computerized adaptive testing is a feasible and effective method for assessing medical students' clinical skills in Korea.
Contribution
The first nationwide implementation of computerized adaptive testing for medical education in Korea.
Findings
The CAT was successfully administered to 1,541 students without significant issues.
The average number of items administered per student was 28, with a mean ability score of 0.55.
Students at extreme ability levels reached the maximum of 50 items due to limited item availability at appropriate difficulty levels.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of transitioning the Clinical Medical Science Comprehensive Examination (CMSCE) to computerized adaptive testing (CAT) in Korea, thereby providing greater opportunities for medical students to accurately compare their clinical competencies with peers nationwide and to monitor their own progress. A medical self-assessment using CAT was conducted from March to June 2023, involving 1,541 medical students who volunteered from 40 medical colleges in Korea. An item bank consisting of 1,145 items from previously administered CMSCE examinations (2019–2021) hosted by the Medical Education Assessment Corporation was established. Items were selected through 2-stage filtering, based on classical test theory (discrimination index above 0.15) and item response theory (discrimination parameter estimates above 0.6 and difficulty parameter estimates…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsInnovations in Medical Education
