Patient perspective of Hesitancies and strategies to increase cancer clinical trial participation
Bre-Anne Fifield, Allison Baker, Omer Elkhidir, Nick Philbin, Isabelle Hinch, Nora McVinnie, Amy Llancari, Claudia Pecoraro, Mahsa Rahimi, Tiana Visconti, Alexandra Shoust, Suzanne McMurphy, Kendall Soucie, Caroline Hamm, Lisa A. Porter

TL;DR
This study explores patient perspectives on cancer clinical trial hesitancy and suggests strategies to increase participation through education and transparency.
Contribution
The study introduces a framework for knowledge translation strategies based on patient-centered insights and hands-on research experiences.
Findings
Five key themes were identified to improve clinical trial accrual: patient-centered approach, educational resources, personalized motivation, local outreach, and transparency.
Hands-on research experiences and data transparency were seen as positive ways to increase trial participation.
Qualitative input confirmed previous findings on patient barriers and suggested actionable methods to address them.
Abstract
Strategies to improve accrual and reduce barriers to cancer clinical trials participation are critical for the advancement and implementation of new treatments and processes to improve cancer patient outcomes. While researchers have identified several barriers to accrual from the perspective of health care providers and patients, mechanisms to address and alleviate these concerns are needed to increase participation and interest in clinical trials. A focus group of 9 people with lived experience of a cancer diagnosis were accrued randomly and provided with a hands-on research experience and educational resources about clinical trials, followed by a focused group discussion to capture perspectives and/or experiences with clinical trials. Focus groups were transcribed and analyzed via Braun & Clarke’s 6-phase reflexive thematic analysis. Five key themes were identified as important to…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsCancer survivorship and care · Ethics in Clinical Research · Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
