Recognition of Japanese university students one year after the discharge of treated water from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station
Hitomi Matsunaga, Isamu Amir, Aizhan Zabirova, Yuya Kashiwazaki, Makiko Orita, Thierry Schneider, Masaharu Tsubokura, Noboru Takamura, Shervin Jamshidi, Sakae Kinase, Sakae Kinase, Sakae Kinase

TL;DR
This study examined how Japanese university students felt about treated water being released from a nuclear power plant a year after it started, finding most accepted it when informed.
Contribution
The study identifies factors influencing acceptance of treated water discharge among university students and suggests effective communication strategies.
Findings
85.7% of participants accepted the discharge of treated water into the ocean.
Acceptance was linked to science majors, information exposure, and belief in government transparency.
Television and newspapers were the most common sources of information about the discharge.
Abstract
The study clarified the perceptions of the Japanese university students regarding their acceptance of the discharge of treated water (DTW) into the Pacific Ocean approximately a year after the process began. Among the 1453 study participants, 1246 (85.7%) showed DTW acceptability, and 207 (14.3%) were unacceptable. Compared to non-acceptance group, majoring in science, experience collecting information or knowledge about DTW, the ability to explain the difference between contaminated water and treated water, the belief that the Japanese government provides accurate information about DTW, the belief that decision-making of the Japanese public is calm and rational about the DTW, and having no feel reluctant to consume kinds of seafood in Fukushima were independently associated with the acceptance group. Furthermore, the most common way to collect information about DTW was via television…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFecal contamination and water quality · Radioactive contamination and transfer · Chemical Analysis and Environmental Impact
