Quality of life scores using SF-12 and SF-36v2 questionnaires for patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Vietnam
Nguyen Thi Lien Ha, Nguyen Binh Hoa, Manisha Yapa, Nguyen Thu Anh, Qingbin Li, Vu Hai Dang, Greg J. Fox, Vu Quoc Dat

TL;DR
This study compares two questionnaires for measuring quality of life in patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis in Vietnam, finding that the shorter version overestimates scores in some groups.
Contribution
The study evaluates SF-12's performance against SF-36v2 for quality of life in MDR-TB patients and identifies overestimation in specific demographics.
Findings
SF-12 scores were higher than SF-36v2 for both physical and mental component summaries.
SF-12 showed moderate correlation with SF-36v2 but tended to overestimate quality of life in older and male patients.
The AUC values indicated strong discriminative ability of SF-12 for mental component scores.
Abstract
The health-related quality of life (QoL) assessed by the 12-item Short Form (SF-12) offers a time-efficient alternative to the 36-item version 2 (SF-36 v2). This study aimed to compare the performance of SF-12 and SF-36 v2 among patients with rifampicin-resistant/multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (RR/MDR-TB) in Vietnam. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among RR/MDR-TB patients treated in seven provinces between October 2020 and March 2023. Participants completed the SF-36 v2 questionnaire at enrollment. Physical (PCS) and mental component summary (MCS) scores were compared between SF-12 and SF-36 v2. Linear regression assessed the ability of PCS-12 and MCS-12 to predict PCS-36 and MCS-36. Discriminative ability was assessed via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. This study included 565 participants with a median age of 45.4 years (IQR 44.2–46.5) and a male proportion…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsTuberculosis Research and Epidemiology · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
