Association of residential neighborhood disadvantage with amyloid PET positivity among cognitively impaired individuals
Charles C. Windon, Elena Tsoy, Jennifer Livaudais-Toman, Torsten B. Neilands, Nynikka R. Palmer, Margo B. Heston, Julene K. Johnson, Lucy Hanna, Constantine Gatsonis, Justin Romanoff, Jon Steingrimsson, Maria C. Carrillo, Peggye Dilworth-Anderson, Bruce E. Hillner

TL;DR
Living in a disadvantaged neighborhood may be linked to lower amyloid levels in the brains of people with cognitive issues, according to a study of over 17,000 individuals.
Contribution
This study is the first to link neighborhood disadvantage with amyloid PET positivity in a large, diverse sample of cognitively impaired individuals.
Findings
Residence in the most disadvantaged neighborhoods was associated with lower odds of amyloid PET positivity by visual interpretation.
The association was not significant when using PET Centiloid values as the measure of amyloid pathology.
The study included a diverse population, with 535 participants from the most disadvantaged neighborhoods.
Abstract
Relationships between Alzheimer’s disease neuropathology, residential neighborhood, and cognitive impairment remain incompletely understood. We examined whether residence within a disadvantaged neighborhood was associated with amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) positivity. We used data from the observational, multisite, Imaging Dementia–Evidence for Amyloid Scanning study that included cognitively impaired Medicare beneficiaries. Our secondary analysis examined multivariable-adjusted associations between neighborhood disadvantage (measured by Area Deprivation Index [ADI] deciles 1–90 vs. 91–100 representing greatest disadvantage) and amyloid PET positivity. Among 15,346 White, 829 Latino, 637 Black/African American, and 321 Asian individuals, 51% were female, mean age was 75.7 years, 535 (3.8%) resided in ADI 91 to 100 decile, and 61.6% were amyloid PET positive. The ADI…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research · Health disparities and outcomes · Urban Green Space and Health
