Editorial: Emerging trends in phage therapeutics to overcome antibiotic resistance
William Calero-Cáceres, Ankush Gupta, Anju Kaushal, Paul Hyman

Abstract
- —Corporación Ecuatoriana para el Desarrollo de la Investigación y la Academia10.13039/100019280
- —Universidad Técnica de Ambato10.13039/100016022
Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsBacteriophages and microbial interactions · Fecal contamination and water quality · SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) remains one of the most critical threats to global health. In 2021, an estimated 4.71 million deaths were associated with bacterial AMR, including 1.14 million deaths directly attributable to AMR (Naghavi et al., 2024). Beyond its clinical impact, AMR also generates major burdens for healthcare systems and threatens food safety and environmental sustainability (Sharma et al., 2024). Despite scientific advances, efforts to curb AMR often fall short due to the complex ecological and evolutionary forces that drive resistance emergence and dissemination (Calero-Cáceres and Balcázar, 2024).
In this context, bacteriophage-based strategies have regained strong interest as alternatives and adjuncts to antibiotics, particularly as resistance increases to last-resort therapies (Pirnay, 2020; Calero-Cáceres and Balcázar, 2025). Although phage therapy is not yet routine in most settings, advances in molecular genetics and genomics now enable more rational selection, characterization, and engineering of phages, including approaches that minimize safety concerns by excluding undesirable genetic elements and improving standardization (Kakkar et al., 2024; Banerjee et al., 2025). Collectively, these developments are accelerating the translation of antibacterial interventions toward more personalized and targeted approaches. This Research Topic highlights advances in phage therapeutics across engineered approaches, clinical translation, microbiome-informed evaluation, and enabling infrastructure for therapeutic deployment.
Ludwig et al. explored engineered T7 lytic phages encoding antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) to enhance killing of multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli. The authors showed that incorporating AMP-encoding sequences can improve activity against both phage-susceptible and phage-resistant bacteria, and they further examined strategies to support peptide secretion and stability. While the work remains at the in vitro stage, it underscores the potential of AMP–phage platforms and highlights key optimization requirements, particularly around expression balance and genetic stability.
Alt et al. report a fracture-related infection in a severely injured patient with polymicrobial, multidrug-resistant pathogens, managed through surgical intervention, systemic antibiotics, and adjunct local phage therapy delivered via a hydrogel. Using molecular monitoring, the authors documented localized phage presence after administration without evident safety concerns, and the patient achieved infection resolution with successful reconstruction at follow-up. This case supports the feasibility of integrating phages into complex surgical infection management, particularly when conventional options are limited.
Wiese et al. describe that high-throughput screening in-vitro platform (“i-screen”) that evaluates phage activity against Clostridium perfringens within a complex chicken cecal microbiota, moving beyond simplified monoculture assays. In this microbiome-informed setting, a C. perfringens–specific phage suppressed pathogen growth with performance comparable to antibiotic benchmarks, while preserving microbiota structure more effectively and showing clear host specificity. The study provides a practical framework to prioritize candidate phages under ecologically relevant conditions, with implications for animal health and food production systems.
Finally, Topa-Pila et al. highlight phage biobanks as enabling infrastructure for precision phage deployment in the AMR era. They argue that scalable therapeutic implementation requires curated collections supported by standardized genomic and functional characterization, harmonized metadata, and interoperable workflows that accelerate phage–host matching. By positioning biobanks as decision-support systems within a One Health perspective, the paper emphasizes that governance, standardization, and data harmonization are essential requirements for coordinated clinical, veterinary, agricultural, and environmental applications.
While the promise of phage therapy is undeniable, its practical adoption necessitates addressing several challenges, including the optimization of phage cocktails for consistent and durable efficacy, clearer regulatory pathways, and scalable manufacturing with robust quality control (Morales and Hyman, 2025). In parallel, important knowledge gaps remain regarding phage–host dynamics in complex communities, the determinants of treatment success across different infection sites, and the evolutionary trajectories that shape both bacterial and phage resistance. Because genomics is increasingly central to phage discovery, characterization, and monitoring, it is also essential to recognize that methodological choices can introduce biases in phage sequencing and downstream interpretation, potentially limiting reproducibility and comparability across studies (Mora-Domínguez and Calero-Cáceres, 2025). Addressing these limitations will require harmonized protocols, transparent reporting standards, and standardized bioinformatic pipelines that support interoperable datasets and translation-ready evidence.
In conclusion, we hope this Research Topic reinforces phage therapeutics as a rapidly advancing and increasingly practical complement to antibiotics in the response to antimicrobial resistance. By bringing together studies spanning engineered phage–antimicrobial strategies, clinical implementation in complex infections, microbiome-informed evaluation platforms, and the development of phage biobanks as enabling infrastructure, this Research Topic highlights key directions shaping the field. Moving these advances toward broader uptake will require coordinated efforts to strengthen evidence generation and comparability, including standardized characterization frameworks, interoperable biobanking systems, and shared analytical workflows that support reliable phage–host matching across settings. Ultimately, global collaboration, interdisciplinary research, and innovation-driven translation will be essential to realize the full potential of phage-based interventions and to position them as a robust component of future AMR mitigation strategies.
The reference list from the paper itself. Each links out to its DOI / PubMed record.
- 1Banerjee B. Halder S. Kumar S. Chaddha M. Ali R. Mohite R. . (2025). Genomic insights into bacteriophages: a new frontier in AMR detection and phage therapy. Brief. Funct. Genomics 24, elaf 011. doi: 10.1093/bfgp/elaf 011, PMID: 40720171 PMC 12302716 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 2Calero-Cáceres W. Balcázar J. L. (2024). Leveraging genomic surveillance for public health: insights from Latin America. Lancet Microbe 5247, 100919. doi: 10.1016/S 2666-5247(24)00159-9, PMID: 38942039 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 3Calero-Cáceres W. Balcázar J. L. (2025). Progress in phage therapy in response to antimicrobial resistance. Virology 609, 110578. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2025.110578, PMID: 40410050 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 4Kakkar A. Kandwal G. Nayak T. Jaiswal L. K. Srivastava A. Gupta A. (2024). Engineered bacteriophages: A panacea against pathogenic and drug resistant bacteria. Heliyon 10, e 34333. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e 34333, PMID: 39100447 PMC 11295868 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 5Mora-Domínguez J. Calero-Cáceres W. (2025). Addressing methodological bias in phageome research to clarify bacteriophage diversity. Lancet Microbe, 101285. doi: 10.1016/j.lanmic.2025.101285, PMID: 41205621 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 6Morales S. Hyman P. (2025). Quis custodiet? Are regulations slowing phage therapy? Drugs Drug Candidates 4, 1. doi: 10.3390/ddc 4010001 · doi ↗
- 7Naghavi M. Vollset S. E. Ikuta K. S. Swetschinski L. R. Gray A. P. Wool E. E. . (2024). Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance 1990–2021: a systematic analysis with forecasts to 2050. Lancet 404, 1199–1226. doi: 10.1016/S 0140-6736(24)01867-1, PMID: 39299261 PMC 11718157 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
- 8Pirnay J. P. (2020). Phage therapy in the year 2035. Front. Microbiol. 11. doi: 10.3389/FMICB.2020.01171/BIBTEX, PMID: 32582107 PMC 7284012 · doi ↗ · pubmed ↗
