# Primary health care networks and impacts in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

## TL;DR

This review examines how primary healthcare provider networks improve health services and outcomes in low- and middle-income countries.

## Contribution

The study systematically maps the impact of PHCPNs on health service processes and clinical outcomes in LMICs.

## Key findings

- PHCPNs improve access to care, coverage, quality, and safety of health services.
- They reduce maternal, neonatal, and perinatal mortalities and stillbirths.
- Most PHCPNs focus on maternal, newborn, and child health outcomes.

## Abstract

Primary healthcare provider networks (PHCPNs) are increasingly recognized as promising strategies to effectively strengthen health systems in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). However, there is limited information on the influence PHCPNs may have on the process and clinical outcomes of health services. This study sought to answer the questions: what is the extent, range, and nature of research on PHCPNs in LMICs, what are the types of PHCPNs described, and what are the processes, e.g. access to care, coverage of health services, quality of care and services, safety of care, and the clinical care outcomes of PHCPNs reported in the published literature? We report on a systematic mixed-methods review on PHCPNs as a strategy to strengthen health systems in LMICs following the PRISMA guidelines. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the ROBINS-I and Mixed Methods Appraisal tools, while a narrative synthesis was employed to describe the results. Fifteen primary studies were found eligible for the review. From the included papers, eight types of PHCPNs were identified across various contexts and countries. We found that the PHCPNs primarily focus on maternal, newborn, and child health outcomes. The study reveals that: (i) PHCPNs contribute to improvements in the process outcomes of health services by enhancing access to care, coverage of health services, quality of care and services, and safety of care, and (ii) they support improvements in clinical outcomes by helping to reduce maternal, neonatal, and perinatal mortalities and stillbirths. This body of literature we reviewed suggests that PHCPNs make a difference in the process and clinical outcomes of health services in LMICs. This review serves as both a mapping and clarification exercise to promote the adoption of PHCPNs and as a foundation for further research, especially in areas of health services beyond maternal, newborn, and child health.