# Prospective, randomized, paired-comparison clinical trial of a new universal adhesive in posterior composite restorations: A 2-year evaluation

## TL;DR

A new universal dental adhesive performed as well as an older version in restoring back teeth over two years, without needing extra acid treatment.

## Contribution

Demonstrates that a new universal adhesive achieves comparable clinical outcomes to an established adhesive in posterior composite restorations.

## Key findings

- Both SBU+ and SBU adhesives showed 100% retention and excellent clinical performance over 2 years.
- No significant differences were found in marginal adaptation or caries recurrence between the two adhesives.
- SBU+ performed well without prior phosphoric acid etching in posterior restorations.

## Abstract

This prospective, randomized, post-market, paired-comparison controlled trial compared the 2-year clinical performance of a new universal adhesive, Scotchbond Universal Plus Adhesive (SBU+), with that of Scotchbond Universal Adhesive (SBU). Both were applied as self-etch (SE) adhesives for composite resin restoration of Class I and Class II preparations.

Two posterior teeth in each of 51 subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to a restoration with SBU + or to a restoration with SBU (control) applied with the SE strategy. Class I and/or Class II preparations were restored with Filtek Universal Restorative. Two calibrated and blinded examiners evaluated the restorations at baseline, 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years, using the modified FDI criteria. The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the outcomes.

At the 2-year evaluation, retention was 100% for both the SBU + and SBU groups. Regarding fracture and retention, 36 of the 37 SBU+ restorations (97%) were graded “Clinically Excellent/Very Good,” while 1/37 (3%) was graded “Clinically Satisfactory.” All 38 SBU restorations (100%) were graded “Clinically Excellent/Very Good”. Marginal adaptation was clinically acceptable for all restorations at 2 years, with no statistically significant difference between the two adhesive materials. Furthermore, no recurrent caries lesions were observed at 2 years, and no restorations received a “Clinically Insufficient/Unsatisfactory” or “Clinically Poor” grade for any FDI criteria during any evaluation visit.

At 2 years, SBU+ exhibited clinical efficacy similar to its predecessor, SBU, in Class I and Class II restorations in adult patients when using the self-etch (SE) technique.

Mildly acidic universal dental adhesives may be used for posterior composite restorations without prior phosphoric acid etching.