# Towards a systematic framework to assess restoration success of interventions in coral reef ecosystems

**Authors:** Aldo Croquer, Sergio D. Guendulain-García, Jonathan S. Lefcheck, Leah Harper, Elizabeth Shaver, Rita I. Sellares-Blasco, Maria F. Villapando, Ainhoa L. Zubillaga, Rebecca Garcia-Camps, Andreina Rivera, Eva Salas, Jennifer Humberstone, Lorenzo Alvarez-Filip

PMC · DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331083 · PLOS One · 2026-03-09

## TL;DR

This paper proposes a systematic framework to evaluate the success of coral reef restoration efforts based on clear goals, measurable outcomes, and long-term ecosystem functioning.

## Contribution

The paper introduces a novel framework for assessing coral restoration success through rigorous experimental design and ecosystem-level indicators.

## Key findings

- Current coral restoration efforts often lack clear goals and rigorous experimental designs.
- Restoration success should be measured by long-term ecosystem functioning, not just short-term coral production.
- The proposed framework aims to improve how restoration outcomes are evaluated and reported.

## Abstract

An ecosystem is defined as a collection of organisms that move energy within and outside of a system, while sustaining both the system itself and the multiple services that benefit humanity. Ecosystem restoration, then, is ultimately concerned with reviving and maintaining ecosystem processes by repopulating organisms and enhancing the habitat after periods of disturbance or loss. Whether interventions are considered “successful” depends on three criteria: 1) were the goals/outcomes clearly defined before implementing the intervention; 2) did the outcome arise directly from the intervention, and 3) does the outcome reflect a functioning ecosystem in the long term (e.g., > 10 years)? The answers to these questions have been challenging for coral restoration practitioners, as they are often hindered by the lack of predefined hypotheses and rigorous experimental design and by confusion between metrics quantifying coral production and outplanting efforts rather than recovery of community structure and ecosystem functioning. As a result, the impacts of restoration efforts are inconsistently and often incorrectly interpreted, and funding is often tied to intervention activities instead of outcomes. Here, we present a framework to implementing robust experimental designs and measure more relevant ecosystem indicators in order to assess the impacts of interventions and promote more informed and effective restoration outcomes. We then illustrate these concepts by reviewing coral restoration-specific case studies to demonstrate the degree to which successful outcomes under such a framework have been achieved. Through these practical recommendations, we hope to support coral restoration practitioners in designing and executing future interventions, and to encourage the broader community, including funders, to adopt a more systematic framework to evaluate and report restoration success.

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** carbonate (MESH:D002254)
- **Species:** Foraminifera (foraminifers, phylum) [taxon 29178], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606], Bryozoa (bryozoans, phylum) [taxon 10205], Hydrozoa (hydrozoans, class) [taxon 6074], crustaceans [taxon 6657], Acropora cervicornis (staghorn coral, species) [taxon 6130]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12970865/full.md

## Figures

5 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12970865/full.md

## References

137 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12970865/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12970865