# Transitioning to midwifery models of care: Implementation insights from focus groups with healthcare leaders in two African countries

**Authors:** Lise-Lotte Franklin Larsson, Solomon Hailemeskel, Helena Lindgren, Ulrika Byrskog, Michael B. Wells, Johanna Blomgren, Joyce Jebet Cheptum, Kaddy Ceesay, Kerstin Erlandsson

PMC · DOI: 10.4102/phcfm.v18i1.5238 · African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine · 2026-02-19

## TL;DR

This study explores how healthcare leaders in Ethiopia and The Gambia view transitioning to midwifery models of care, highlighting barriers and facilitators to successful implementation.

## Contribution

The study provides insights into context-specific factors influencing the adoption of midwifery models of care in two African countries.

## Key findings

- Facilitators include midwives' advocacy and community engagement in maternal health decision-making.
- Barriers include workforce shortages, limited infrastructure, donor dependency, and cultural resistance to midwifery practices.
- The study emphasizes the need for strategies that strengthen infrastructure, financing, and midwives' leadership roles.

## Abstract

Midwifery models of care, endorsed by the World Health Organization (WHO), offer rights-based, person-centred care with proven benefits for safer maternal and newborn care worldwide. Despite these demonstrated benefits, the successful adoption of midwifery models of care depends on context-specific factors, making it essential to understand how healthcare leaders perceive and approach such transitions.

To examine healthcare leaders’ perceptions of transitioning to midwifery models of care in Ethiopia and The Gambia, and to identify key barriers and facilitators influencing implementation.

The study was conducted in Ethiopia and The Gambia within their respective maternal health system contexts, focusing on national and sub-national leadership perspectives.

A qualitative study using open-ended, semi-structured interviews. An inductive thematic analysis was applied to explore leaders’ insights on midwifery models of care and system readiness for transition.

Facilitators included midwives’ active advocacy for women’s rights and strong community engagement in maternal health decision-making. Common barriers across both countries were workforce shortages, limited health system infrastructure, donor dependency, and persistent gaps in access for rural populations. Additional barriers included inadequate transport networks, geographic inaccessibility, financial challenges limiting women’s ability to reach skilled care, hierarchical governance structures that restrict midwives’ professional autonomy, insufficient facility readiness, and cultural resistance to evidence-based midwifery practices.

Transitioning to midwifery-led models of care requires context-specific strategies aligned with the World Health Organization implementation guidance, with particular attention to strengthening infrastructure, financing, and workforce capacity.

The study underscores the need to integrate midwives more fully into policy and governance structures. Strengthening their leadership and advocacy roles may enhance the visibility, influence, and overall contribution of the midwifery profession within national health systems.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** FGD (MESH:D003057), maternal (MESH:D000079262), stillbirth (MESH:D050497), cardiovascular complications (MESH:D002318), eclampsia (MESH:D004461), deaths (MESH:D003643), neonatal deaths (MESH:D066087)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12969609/full.md

## References

32 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12969609/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12969609