# Making sense together: participatory sensemaking, learning cycles, and group roles

**Authors:** Christian Kronsted, Matthew Henley, Miriam Giguere

PMC · DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1746763 · Frontiers in Psychology · 2026-02-23

## TL;DR

The paper explains how group roles and social interactions drive collective learning through a 4E framework combining individual learning cycles with group dynamics.

## Contribution

The paper introduces a novel 4E account of the Kolb learning cycle by integrating group role theory, ecological psychology, and participatory sense-making.

## Key findings

- Group roles influence transitions between phases of the Kolb learning cycle.
- Social interaction drives learning as a joint cognitive system.
- Individual behavior emerges from group dynamics rather than individual contributions alone.

## Abstract

The Kolb Learning Cycle is a popular model of experiential learning in which agents move through four phases: experimentation, concretization, observation, and conceptualization. This model is a dynamic learning model that aligns well with embodied approaches to cognition, as it centers on student agency, inquiry, and exploration. However, there is currently no 4E (embodied, enactive, embedded, and extended) account of the learning cycle. Furthermore, Kolb’s theory focuses solely on behavior and learning in the individual. We here create a 4E account of the Kolb learning cycle by combining it with group role theory, ecological psychology, and participatory sense-making (PSM). We argue that, as individual members cycle through various group roles and their associated Kolb phases, they aid the group as a joint cognitive system in transitioning to new modes of engagement at the group level. Moving through group roles (leader, follower, naysayer, observer) often moves the agent into a new Kolb phase, which, in turn, changes the emergent dynamics of the entire group. Thus, social interaction can drive the learning cycle. Because the behavior of the individual is emergent, we cannot rely on reductivist accounts to explain group learning behaviors as the outcome of individual contributions. Rather, we consider the group as a cognitive system that drives learning.

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** fatigue (MESH:D005221)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12968274/full.md

## Figures

4 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12968274/full.md

## References

80 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12968274/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12968274