# Data collection methods in qualitative research: researchers' reflections

## TL;DR

This paper discusses various qualitative data collection methods and highlights innovative approaches that reflect cultural contexts and enhance research authenticity.

## Contribution

The novelty lies in introducing culturally situated data collection methods like Kurakani, Pandheri Guff, and Chautari Guff.

## Key findings

- Established methods like interviews and focus groups have strengths and challenges in capturing human experiences.
- Innovative approaches such as Kurakani and Chautari Guff offer context-sensitive ways to collect qualitative data.
- Methodological creativity and adaptation to local contexts improve research rigor and ethical knowledge co-construction.

## Abstract

This article explores qualitative data collection methods based on researchers' experiences, integrating established techniques with culturally situated innovations. It explores core methods—interviews, observations, focus group discussions, and self-reflection—featuring their applications, strengths, and challenges in capturing nuanced human experiences. Moving beyond conventional frameworks, the article introduces and elaborates on innovative, context-sensitive data collection approaches such as Kurakani (informal conversational inquiry), Pandheri Guff (contemplative dialogue among women), and Chautari Guff (public participatory dialogue). Grounded in the authors' critical reflections from their own research journeys, the discussion offers practical insights for both novice and experienced researchers. It advocates methodological creativity and epistemic diversity, arguing that thoughtful adaptation and the generation of methods aligned with local contexts enhance rigor, authenticity, and the ethical co-construction of knowledge in qualitative research.