# Combination Effects of Clindamycin and Benzoyl Peroxide Against Cutibacterium acnes

**Authors:** Koyo Yoshihara, Shoji Seyama, Nobukazu Hayashi, Yuki Horiuchi, Waka Ishida, Takae Yasuda, Ikue Hou, Tokihiko Shimada, Saori Murakami, Mie Kakuta, Junichi Sugai, Masako Watanabe, Akiko Ishii, Mayumi Nomoto, Hiroko Ichimiya, Noriko Tanaka, Chikage Takeo, Kazuha Kasugai, Miwa Kobayashi, Utako Kimura, Masumi Kohno, Emi Nakazaki, Chiaki Murase, Yoshitsune Ban, Yuko Fukano, Yoshiki Miyachi, Hidemasa Nakaminami

PMC · DOI: 10.1111/1346-8138.70170 · The Journal of Dermatology · 2026-02-09

## TL;DR

Combining clindamycin and benzoyl peroxide reduces resistance in acne bacteria compared to using clindamycin alone.

## Contribution

Demonstrates that combination therapy suppresses resistance development in Cutibacterium acnes more effectively than monotherapy.

## Key findings

- Combination therapy reduced clindamycin resistance rates to 22.9% compared to 46.7% with monotherapy.
- No resistant strains emerged under combination therapy, while monotherapy had resistance frequencies of 8.1–8.7×10−8.
- Clindamycin/benzoyl peroxide combination effectively prevents resistance in Cutibacterium acnes.

## Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of combination therapy with clindamycin and benzoyl peroxide in treating acne vulgaris. We assessed the antimicrobial susceptibility of Cutibacterium acnes isolates obtained from these patients. In addition, the potential risk of C. acnes developing resistance to clindamycin and benzoyl peroxide following exposure was investigated in vitro. We analyzed 182 C. acnes isolates from patients with acne to evaluate the clindamycin susceptibility and resistance determinants and to examine the association between topical clindamycin use and resistance. We also tested the resistance frequency of C. acnes to clindamycin monotherapy and clindamycin/benzoyl peroxide combination therapy in vitro. The clindamycin resistance rates in the clindamycin/benzoyl peroxide and clindamycin monotherapy groups were 22.9% and 46.7%, respectively. The combination group showed a significantly lower clindamycin resistance rate (p < 0.05). Under clindamycin monotherapy, resistant strains emerged at a frequency of 8.1 × 10−8 to 8.7 × 10−8, whereas no resistant strains were detected under clindamycin/benzoyl peroxide combination conditions. The combination of clindamycin and benzoyl peroxide effectively suppressed the emergence of clindamycin‐resistant C. acnes.

## Linked entities

- **Chemicals:** clindamycin (PubChem CID 446598), benzoyl peroxide (PubChem CID 7187)
- **Diseases:** acne vulgaris (MONDO:0011438)
- **Species:** Cutibacterium acnes (taxon 1747)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** acne (MESH:D000152)
- **Chemicals:** Clindamycin (MESH:D002981), Benzoyl Peroxide (MESH:D001585)
- **Species:** Cutibacterium acnes (species) [taxon 1747], Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12967766/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12967766/full.md

## References

15 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12967766/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12967766