# Simple decompression vs. subcutaneous anterior transposition of the ulnar nerve: the 2025 update on the optimal treatment for cubital tunnel syndrome

**Authors:** Bishnu Pokharel, Chiara Fossati, Sailesh Bhattarai, Faizan Vaja, Andrew Kemetse, Aurelien Traverso, Pietro S. Randelli

PMC · DOI: 10.1016/j.xrrt.2025.100630 · JSES Reviews, Reports, and Techniques · 2025-11-29

## TL;DR

This paper compares two surgical treatments for cubital tunnel syndrome and finds no clear winner between them in terms of effectiveness.

## Contribution

The study provides an updated 2025 comparison of clinical outcomes for two ulnar nerve treatments.

## Key findings

- No statistical difference in clinical outcomes between simple decompression and subcutaneous anterior transposition.
- Some studies suggest simple decompression may lead to higher recurrence and revision rates.
- Both techniques continue to show good results for treating cubital tunnel syndrome.

## Abstract

This 2024 update aims to compare the clinical outcomes, recurrence, and revision rates between simple decompression (SD) and subcutaneous anterior transposition (SAT) of the ulnar nerve for treating cubital tunnel syndrome (CuTS). A systematic review of articles from PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar was performed in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We selected all English-language comparative studies published from January 2000 to June 2024, comparing SD and SAT concerning postoperative outcomes of surgical treatment for CuTS. Ten articles met the inclusion criteria. We found no statistical difference in the clinical outcomes of SD and SAT. Two studies indicated SD was superior to SAT. Four studies concluded that both techniques were equally effective for CuTS treatment. Three studies were inconclusive, and one study reported in situ decompression as inferior to SAT, with a high recurrence rate. As of 2025, the surgical approach to CuTS remains consistent with current practice. Both SD and SAT of the ulnar nerve continue to demonstrate good clinical outcomes. Although SD may be associated with higher rates of recurrences and revision surgeries, no clear superiority of one technique over the other has been established.

## Linked entities

- **Diseases:** cubital tunnel syndrome (MONDO:0043982)

## Full-text entities

- **Diseases:** anterior (MESH:D020759), ulnar nerve compression (MESH:D017769), complication (MESH:D008107), traumatic injuries (MESH:D014947), pain (MESH:D010146), entrapment syndrome (MESH:D009408), CuTS (MESH:D020430), benign (MESH:D009369), anterior transposition of ulnar nerve (MESH:D020424), carpal tunnel syndrome (MESH:D002349), SD (MESH:D003665), valgus deformity (MESH:D060906), arthritis (MESH:D001168), SAT (MESH:D013352)
- **Chemicals:** SAT (-)
- **Species:** Homo sapiens (human, species) [taxon 9606]

## Full text

_Full body text omitted from this summary view._ Fetch the complete paper as Markdown: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12966733/full.md

## Figures

1 figure with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12966733/full.md

## References

19 references — full list in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12966733/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12966733