# Cool and Shady: Ecophysiological Preferences of Chrysophytes

**Authors:** Christina Bock, Guido Sieber, Sara Beszteri, Frida Klein, Hannah‐Marie Stappert, Célina Wessel, Simone Engelskirchen, Jens Boenigk

PMC · DOI: 10.1111/jeu.70071 · 2026-03-06

## TL;DR

This study explores how different chrysophyte species respond to changes in temperature and light in alpine lakes.

## Contribution

The study reveals consistent growth optima for chrysophytes across diverse alpine and pre-alpine habitats.

## Key findings

- Most chrysophyte strains showed peak growth between 15°C and 19°C.
- Growth rates increased with light up to a species-specific optimum before plateauing or declining.
- All strains required light for growth, showing negative responses in darkness.

## Abstract

Chrysophyceae (Stramenopiles) are a diverse group of protists widely distributed in various aquatic habitats, including alpine lakes, where they play key ecological roles. Their nutritional modes—phototrophy, heterotrophy, and mixotrophy—enable them to adapt to the unique light and temperature conditions found across altitudinal gradients in mountain environments. This study investigates the growth responses of three mixotrophic and three phototrophic chrysophyte strains, isolated from alpine and pre‐alpine lakes, to varying light intensities and temperatures. Our results show that both temperature and light intensity exert strong, species‐specific effects on the growth of phototrophic and mixotrophic Chrysophyceae. Despite their contrasting original habitats, most strains shared similar growth optima, with peak performance generally observed between 15°C and 19°C and reduced growth at both lower and higher temperatures. All strains exhibited negative growth in darkness, confirming their phototrophic dependence. Growth rates typically increased with light availability up to a species‐specific optimum (12–35 μE m−2 s−1), beyond which either a plateau or a decline was observed. Despite environmental differences among their habitats of origin, temperature and light optima were remarkably consistent across strains.

## Linked entities

- **Species:** Chrysophyceae (taxon 2825)

## Full-text entities

- **Chemicals:** NSY (-), ice (MESH:D007053), chlorophyll (MESH:D002734), carbon (MESH:D002244), Fucoxanthin (MESH:C025164)
- **Species:** Mallomonas sp. (species) [taxon 2003107], Spumella (genus) [taxon 89043], Uroglenopsis sp. (species) [taxon 2585089], Mallomonas caudata (species) [taxon 52549], Saccharomyces cerevisiae (baker's yeast, species) [taxon 4932], Chrysophyceae (chrysomonads, class) [taxon 2825], Dinobryon sertularia (species) [taxon 98060], Dinobryon (genus) [taxon 98059], Limnohabitans planktonicus (species) [taxon 540060], Dinobryon sociale (species) [taxon 98061], Mallomonas annulata (species) [taxon 52548], M. elongata [taxon 445168], Mallomonas elongata (species) [taxon 984088], Kephyrion (genus) [taxon 1074835]
- **Mutations:** C to -0, C-21 C, C-19 C
- **Cell lines:** WI26K-B — Homo sapiens (Human), Finite cell line (CVCL_V826)

## Figures

3 figures with captions in the complete paper: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12966406/full.md

---
Source: https://tomesphere.com/paper/PMC12966406