A pilot study on protocol consistency and graph metric reproducibility in microstructure-weighted connectomes
Maddalena Cavallo, Mattia Ricchi, Aaron Axford, Kylie Yeung, Jordan McGing, Leonardo Brizi, Damian J. Tyler, Claudia Testa, James T. Grist

TL;DR
This study assesses the reproducibility of microstructure-weighted brain connectomes using diffusion parameters and identifies reliable metrics for tracking brain connectivity changes.
Contribution
The study introduces a systematic evaluation of reproducibility in microstructure-weighted connectomes using a four-shell acquisition protocol.
Findings
Fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, and intra-neurite volume fractions showed high reproducibility with low variability.
Graph metrics from FA-, MD-, and INVF-weighted connectomes were consistent, except for modularity.
ECVF-weighted connectomes had poor reproducibility, with high variability and low correlation.
Abstract
Microstructure-weighted connectomes incorporate diffusion parameters into structural networks, offering a rich characterisation of brain connectivity. While these biologically-informed connectomes have shown sensitivity to pathology-related alterations (for example in multiple sclerosis), their reproducibility remains largely unexplored. In this study, we evaluated the consistency of connectomes weighted with tensor and Bingham-NODDI parameters, employing a four-shell acquisition protocol to ensure accurate fibre reconstruction. Phantom and in vivo (N=4) data were acquired to assess temporal, inter-site and inter-protocol reproducibility of weighting parameters and inter-site stability of graph metrics. High reproducibility was observed for fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), and intra-neurite (INVF) and intra-cellular (ICVF) volume fractions, with coefficients of…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsFunctional Brain Connectivity Studies · Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications · Neurological disorders and treatments
