# Establishment of optimal mandibular incisor inclination: A retrospective comparison between surgery-first and conventional orthodontic approaches

## TL;DR

This study compares two orthodontic approaches for correcting jaw misalignment and finds that conventional methods achieve better tooth alignment than the surgery-first approach.

## Contribution

The study provides empirical evidence on the effectiveness of presurgical orthodontics in achieving optimal incisor inclination.

## Key findings

- The conventional group showed significantly greater changes in incisor inclination than the surgery-first group.
- The conventional group achieved values closer to the norm for incisor inclination.
- The surgery-first group required more compensation in incisor positioning post-surgery.

## Abstract

Surgery-first orthodontic treatment offers early facial profile improvement and shorter treatment duration. This study investigated the incisor relationship in skeletal Class III malocclusion patients treated with conventional orthognathic surgery (COS) and the surgery-first approach (SFA).

Sixty-eight patients who underwent mandibular setback surgery for skeletal Class III malocclusion were divided into 2 groups: the COS group (n = 34, 19 males and 15 females; mean age, 20.5 ± 2.9 years) treated with conventional three-stage surgical orthodontic treatment and the SFA group (n = 34, 20 males and 14 females; mean age, 21.9 ± 3.5 years) treated without presurgical orthodontics. Lateral cephalograms were analyzed before treatment (T0) and after debonding (T1). The changing pattern of mandibular incisor mandibular plane angle (IMPA) was compared between the groups, and the amount of change was assessed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and mandibular incisor inclinations at each stage were compared to the norm value to calculate the achievement ratio.

At T0, the IMPA was 81.6° in the COS group and 80.7° in the SFA group. At T1, the IMPA was 88.6° in the COS group and 83.3° in the SFA group. Considerable presurgical decompensation occurred in the COS group, while postsurgical decompensation was insufficient in the SFA group. ANCOVA revealed that the COS group exhibited a significantly greater change in IMPA than the SFA group (p = 0.001). At T1, the achievement ratio showed that the COS group (94.4%) was closer to the norm than the SFA group (85.5%) (p = 0.001), indicating that the SFA group showed more compensated mandibular incisors than the COS group.

The COS group demonstrated more effective mandibular incisor decompensation and achieved values closer to the norm than the SFA group. These findings suggest that presurgical orthodontics is essential for achieving optimal incisor inclination, and clinicians should carefully consider the need for sufficient decompensation when planning treatment with the SFA approach.