Closing the loop: Benefits and challenges of sharing clinical trial results with participants after trial close-out
Jodi L. Gallant, Tristan Paranavitana, Sofia Bzovsky, Kaitlyn Pusztai, Paula McKay, Debra Marvel, Jeffrey L. Wells, Julie Menard, Jamal Al-Asiri, Joseph T. Patterson, Gerard Slobogean, Sheila Sprague, Mohit Bhandari, Mohit Bhandari, Anthony D. Harris, C. Daniel Mullins

TL;DR
This study explores how to share clinical trial results with participants after the trial ends, finding that most want to know the results and prefer online summaries.
Contribution
The study provides insights into participant preferences for receiving trial results and highlights the feasibility of post-trial communication.
Findings
95.5% of participants wanted to know the trial results.
Most preferred receiving results via online summary posters.
Learning results increased future trial participation likelihood for 51% of participants.
Abstract
Clinical trial participants have a right to know the results of the trials in which they participate. Trial results are often not shared directly with participants and concerns with privacy and resource constraints may prevent researchers from contacting participants after trial completion. The objectives of this cross-sectional study were to explore the feasibility of contacting orthopaedic fracture trial participants after trial completion and to determine the preferences and priorities of the participants who wished to know the results. Following the publication of the primary manuscript, we attempted to contact participants from the completed PREPARE trial at Hamilton Health Sciences to determine if they would like to know the trial results. We asked participants about their preferences for receiving trial results, their experiences upon learning them, and if they wished to learn…
Genes, proteins, chemicals, diseases, species, mutations and cell lines named across the full text — each resolved to its canonical identifier and authoritative record.
Click any figure to enlarge with its caption.
Figure 1Peer Reviews
No public reviews on file for this paper yet. If you reviewed it on a platform where reviews are public (OpenReview, ICLR, NeurIPS, ICML), you can paste yours below so the community can read it here.
Videos
No videos yet. Explain this paper in a talk, walkthrough, or lecture? Add one.
Taxonomy
TopicsEthics in Clinical Research · Mental Health and Patient Involvement · Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
